DevelopmentNow Blog
 Thursday, September 17, 2009

WikiWorldBook, the global address book, launched a social contact widget today allowing users to bring all their social networking profiles and email into a single button. Privacy controls and anti-spam features let you be found on the web on your terms, without spammers.

We've put a good amount of work into the button, and are proud to have WikiWorldBook as one of our clients. If you're looking for a better way to let friends or strangers find and contact you, take WikiWorldBook's button for a spin.

September 17, 2009    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Saturday, August 01, 2009

We're proud to announce the launch of a new social network for brides -- Style Circle. It's a social network built for our client Style Me Pretty, allowing brides, wedding planners, vendors, and wedding enthusiasts around the globe to learn, plan, share, and socialize.

It's built using BuddyPress and WordPress-MU, and a lot of work was done to make sure the user experience was not only friendly, but pretty. Plus, it features a very cool Inspiration Board Builder tool, allowing users to assemble thousands of professional-quality wedding-related images into boards and collages for their own exploration and inspiration.

August 1, 2009    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Sunday, March 01, 2009

You can now find old friends and learn more about people using Twitter using the new Twitter FreeSearch Bot we built for WikiWorldBook. To use it, just follow @freesearch and send either a reply or a direct message to freesearch followed by the name of the person you want to know more about.

e.g. @freesearch Barak Obama

You'll then get back a tweet with information about that person's social network profiles around the web, powered by the people search engine at WikiWorldBook.

March 1, 2009    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Thursday, November 20, 2008

For a while the main Joomla! social networking plugin was Community Builder, which we've used for a large Joomla-based social network. CB is ok but fell short in some areas, and it was necessary to stitch together a number of other plugins to get a full SNS featureset. However, JomSocial was just released today (by Azrul, the makers of JomComment and other fine components) and looks to be a strong viable alternative to CB for building an open source social network. We're looking forward to working with JomSocial in the coming months and will relate our experiences as we get more in-depth. In the meantime, if you're looking to build an open source social network or add social media capabilities to your existing Joomla! site, feel free to contact us.

November 20, 2008    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Saturday, November 08, 2008

Elgg announced version 1.1 about a week ago. We looked at Elgg a while back when it was young and a bit more education-centric, but it has matured into an open source platform with a good adherence to standards such as OpenSocial and OpenID, as well as an API. Feature-wise it still falls behind some other platforms like phpFox, Handshakes, or Dolphin, but the price is good and the look is clean.

November 8, 2008    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Thursday, September 25, 2008

FYI, those of you with a Ning social network can look forward to an iPhone-optimized interface after tonight's release. It will be an iPhone web app (not a native app), and while iPhones will automatically be shown the iPhone interface, you can go there manually by browsing to http://yournetwork.ning.com/m. While you can participate in the network, not every feature is available for the iPhone interface.

We're glad to see companies moving forward with developing optimized versions of their sites for the iPhone and other handheld devices -- while "normal" sites are often tolerable on  an iPhone, sometimes it's better to present a faster, more usable interface that focuses on what a mobile user likes to do the most.

Edit: the release has been pushed back to Friday, September 26th. Then again it's been pushed back a few times before, but we shall see.

September 25, 2008    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]



 Thursday, February 28, 2008

Wikia just released an open source social networking extension to MediaWiki, allowing anyone with a MediaWiki install to let their users create profiles, upload avatars, message each other, and do other traditional social networking activities. There are already a number of open source SNS platforms, but this makes for a tempting starting point for any wiki-centric community site.

ReadWriteWeb has a longer overview.

February 28, 2008    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Monday, February 25, 2008

Well, I've had it. I must get at least a dozen "please join my crappy network" invite messages each week from Ning networks. I haven't yet found a way to prevent them from "inviting" me, and all the emails violate CAN-SPAM in a number of different ways (no "unsubscribe feature", no physical address).

Their FAQ says

“To protect your privacy, only your friends and certain members of social networks you belong to can send you messages on Ning. If you’re a member of a network, the Network Creator and Administrators can send you messages and you can message them back. Further, if you belong to any groups, the Group Creator and Admins can get in touch with you. In order to send another member of a network a message, you’ll need to ask them to be your friend first.”

But apparently any Ning network can send me emails like "Come join me on Lame Group on SpamNetwork...".

Just this morning I got 6 different invites from "Members Only Network", all within the space of 10 minutes.

So for now I would suggest not joining anything on Ning until they address their growing spam issues.

Edit: Ok I found the culprits -- the spams were coming from some of my Ning.com "friends." *sigh* I knew there was a reason why too many friends was a bad thing.

February 25, 2008    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Wednesday, November 07, 2007
I spoke with one of my social networking clients today about how to get their user participation up. My client mentioned that they saw people registering, but they just weren't doing anything. I was thinking about the conversation on the way home from work today and wanted to blog out some thoughts.

What's In It For Your Users?

The first question I asked was "From your perspective, what does your site offer users? Why should they sign up, and why should they participate?" It's a good question to ask yourself about your site -- what's in it for your users? Do you have a good value proposition? Who is your target audience? Who is your competition and why are you better? Would you use your site? Do you use your own site, and how often? Are your needs unique? What do your friends and associates think? Do they use the site too?

It's easy enough to stick a survey from Zoomerang or PollDaddy on your site to collect some feedback, too. You need to understand the needs of your users and the value you provide -- you can't just build a site and wait for the content to roll in.

A Combination of Factors for User Participation

Getting user participation is a combination of a few things:
  1. There should be things drawing your users into the site
  2. There should be as few barriers as possible preventing them from participating
  3. To grow, you need more and more users
  4. Some percentage of users will do nothing

Draw Users Into Your Site

#1 begins with two standard fares: content and activities. Having lots of interesting content is great, but content isn't all you need -- this is an interactive site, not a book you just flip through and read. So give users a chance to do something, too. Let them put their two cents in, compete against other users, show off their skills/photos/etc, win a prize, gain notoriety, ask a question. And give users instant feedback if possible. Let them see the results of their participation.

Important point: Users need to know that if they do something, they will get a (positive) result. That's important to realize. That's why no one participates in forums with no posts -- why bother posting to an empty bulletin board, since no one will probably read and/or reply to what you said? There's a reason why forum moderators seed content and prune empty threads.

Another thing talked about is stickiness. Stickiness means getting users to come back. Maybe there's an activity that keeps them logging back in to check on stuff (e.g. checking your score or approving a friend request), or maybe your site emails them to tell them that "XYZ just happened on the site, click here to visit the site and check it out!" Make logging into the site worthwhile. If the content (text, photos, etc) is interesting, that could be reason enough to come back.

Think about the sites that you visit regularly -- why do you visit them? Now think about the sites you participate in regularly -- why do you participate, and are the reasons different from the sites you merely browse?

Lastly, make sure users know what your site has to offer. Laura G from Ning talks about Welcome Centers -- does your site have a prominent area, preferably on the home page, welcoming new users, telling them what the site is about, and encouraging them to join in the fun?

Eliminate Barriers to Participation

Top of the list -- make registering as easy as possible, or eliminate it. Allow people to post comments, rate, & review things without registering at all. Then, allow registered users something extra as incentive (maybe they can gain reputation, or access special features, or not have to use the CAPTCHA all the time). Make registration quick & simple -- require as little as possible before they can participate. Don't make them wait 5-10 minutes for a confirmation email (*unless that kind of security is really necessary). Don't redirect them to the home page after registering so they have to remember what page they were on. Don't make them log in again, after they just told you what their username and password should be. People will register because they want to do something, and the more hoops they have to jump through before they're able to do what they wanted to, the more their enthusiasm will wane.

A cumbersome registration process is part of a larger theme -- usability. A site needs to be easy to use, be responsive, be intuitive, work on all browsers, not require rebooting your computer to load a plugin, etc. If a site is simple and easy, then people enjoy using it, and they'll use it more often.

Granted, barriers can be higher if the reward to your users is higher. Lonely bachelors are more willing to put up with an involved registration process if it means they can browse pictures of pretty girls and find true love. But in general, don't make the barriers any higher than they need to be. If you start getting too much content, you can apply the brakes later.

Another good tip is to visit a non-technical friend (who's not a member), ask them to participate in your site, and watch them use your site. And I mean physically sit behind them and observe. Watch what they do, see where they get caught up, and understand what might be frustrating your users.

Get More Users

I won't talk much about this, but obviously, you need to get as much of your target userbase to your site as you can. Note I said target userbase, not just any random set of users. That's because your site has some sort of theme, niche, or focus, and you want to reinforce that. Social sites' value and appeal increases with more users (and more user generated content), so make sure your site is something your users will share. Include standard "viral" elements in your site -- invite a friend, email this XYZ to a friend, import your Yahoo/Gmail/etc contacts. Give people a direct reason to include more people. Give them points, give them a "friend count", something. Make a facebook/OpenSocial app. Get some buzz. Get blogs to write about you. Do some SEO. Buy keywords. Acquire an existing social network.

Some Users Will Always Be Lame

After all your hard work, some users will always do nothing. Some might start participating after a while (especially if you email them from time to time to let them know about new and interesting features), but there will always be a percentage of users who register on your site but don't post anything, don't upload any photos, and never come back. First off -- that's normal, and that's totally ok. If your site is healthy, those inactive users will fall by the wayside as your active users fill in your content. Secondly, if it still bothers you, ask yourself "why did these users register in the first place, and why didn't they do anything else?" Make sure that your site's registration process is easy and leads people towards contributing. If it's a cumbersome process, you may find that after completing registration, users are too tired to do anything else.


November 7, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Read/WriteWeb had a favorable article recently about a new social network for foodies: iFood.tv. It features the standard social network elements, but also allows users to create, share, rate, and comment on recipies.

I also noticed that iFood.tv is built using Drupal, an open source CMS/building-blocks system with many pre-existing SNS modules. Drupal is a popular and powerful choice if you want to build something custom, but you don't want to build everything from scratch.

September 12, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Tuesday, September 11, 2007

TechCrunch wrote an article today about ModelsHotel, a social network for models only. You have to be a professional model to join. The writeup was prompted by an article about ModelsHotel in the WSJ, which mentioned that the site just got a $10,000 banner ad deal, and is looking to raise $1.5 million in capital.

Normally this would be a pretty ordinary story about a vertical social network in a decent niche.

However, I noticed that ModelsHotel is running AlstraSoft E-Friends, a $300/year social networking package (good ol "view source"). In fact, other than removing the standard header & footer, ModelsHotel doesn't look that tweaked.  

ModelsHotel Profile.

Standard eFriends Profile.

Granted, I'm not a model, so perhaps there's more custom functionality that just isn't visible from the outside.

So what's my point? Well, I have one point and one concern:

Point: (Initial) success in the web can come from innovative technology, business prowess. Having both is great but not required.

In the case of ModelsHotel, it's not the technology. ModelsHotel isn't getting $10,000 advertising deals, Wall Street Journal articles, & the hope of $1.5 million because they spent paid $300 for some software and spent a week installing it and tweaking the template. They're getting this action because of the niche they chose, the company focus, the effort they've put into the business (outside of the actual software effort), and the business skill and connections of the owners, management, and staff. 

Their technology isn't winning them anything -- their business side is. The technology merely enables their business focus to succeed (at least for now). You cannot pay $300 for off-the-shelf SNS software, do nothing else, & wait for the money to roll in.

Concern: ModelsHotel will need to do something with the site to prevent competition

From what I can tell, the software they're running seems very similar to the default eFriends install. If I'm right, that means that someone could create a same-or-"better" ModelsHotel clone in a weekend. And since ModelsHotel has a very restrictive entry policy (apparently it only has 1000 members), a competitor might be able to quickly get the same number of members.

I'm not saying that ModelsHotel can't successfully fend off competition purely through non-technical means (marketing, partnerships, contracts, significant market/mindshare, covert model hacker squads sent to destroy competitors' servers, etc). Because again, you can be successful through non-technical means.

But still, especially given the fact that it's a web company ... it's going to be much harder to stave off competing networks if they stick with the default install. My $0.02.

 

September 11, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]



 Saturday, August 25, 2007

White label SNS providers...

http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/02/12/list-of-white-label-social-networking-platforms/

With so many providers out there, how does one choose? I'm wondering if it would be valuable to post a screencast of how to set up & configure a few different SNS tools (e.g. Ning, phpFox, etc.)...

August 25, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]



 Thursday, August 23, 2007

Duncan Riley of TechCrunch blogged today about Damsels in Success, a new business-oriented social site for professional women. The name is of course a play on "Damsels in Distress."

Duncan felt that because he was male, he was "totally unqualified to pass judgement" on the site. I think Duncan's judgement would have been ok, but I admire his sentiment. I'm male, too, but I'll try to give it an honest review. I will agree that, like Duncan, I'm not part of the site's target community, and so I can't promise to know whether it'll meet the particular needs of women or not. So I'll try to keep my review focused on how it does as a social network in general, based on my opinion (of course).

Features

Nice looking site. I definitely see the LinkedIn angle, w/ the Jobs section being so prominent. Then again, the site is about women & business. When you register, there are a number of required fields (e.g. age) that could be a turnoff.

The "stories" feature is neat, since they're not just random blog posts, but instead posted as answers to specific questions, giving the site owners a chance to encourage users to contribute, steer the content, & keep it aligned w/ the theme.

The forums are run by up to 50 "damsels," and only they can start threads, although anyone can comment on an existing thread. There's also an advice/ask the expert area, where the expert blogs about community-submitted questions and people can comment.

Issues

Three main downsides that I see:

The name

Overall, more (female) TechCrunch commenters seemed to feel the name was a lame, cutesy pun off a sexist statement, rather than sharp and clever. I think the name is fine, but it may hurt their acceptance and turn off a percentage of the very people they want to attract. Then again, there may be people who love the name(?).

Profile section

The actual profile section feels a bit watered down, but I suspect that's because the site is still pretty new. I'm sure they'll flesh it out as the community grows. And maybe I've been looking at too many "fancy" social networks these days. There are a number of required profile fields (e.g. age) that I'm not sure why they're required, and could be a turnoff.

Restricted User Generated Content

Maybe I missed it, but it doesn't seem like ordinary members can initiate a new topic or line of thought anywhere (other than by thread hijacking, or by sending in a question to the Advice area & hoping it gets blogged about). You can only respond or comment on existing questions, posts, and topics created by either the site owners or the up-to-50 official "damsels."

If I wanted to ask the community a new question (e.g. "What other social networks would you recommend for women in business?"), I wouldn't be able to.

I can see how "steering" content can help encourage participation, strengthen a theme, and reduce off-topic threads, but I still think community members should be allowed to start threads to ask something new, otherwise they may go elsewhere if they don't see their particular question. Even a "General Discussion" type forum would help.

I assume this was a deliberate design decision by the site, and I'd be interested in learning more about the rationale. And again, I may be missing something.

Technology

From a technology angle, it's written in ASP.NET -- something you don't see very often for startups. I'm glad to see .NET being used, as Rails & PHP (or at least Rails) often get all the love.

Monetization

Since jobs are featured so prominently, my guess that the site will eventually offer some sort of fee-based "enhanced" job posting. I've seen loads of blogs & communities allowing me to post a 30-day job ad for $75-$300, so perhaps there's some money to be made in the niche job site market. Most social networks' revenue models seem to be restricted to "ads", "get acquired", and/or "huh?", so perhaps it's nice to see a change of pace.

Revenue could also be gained from advertising, but that's pretty much a given.

Conclusion

Yet another social network, but I haven't seen many in that particular niche, and I think the business/jobs focus and atypical revenue possibilities might help it rise above the tide. I really think they need to loosen the controls on the content, though, otherwise the community might go to a less restricted site. I'm also a bit concerned about the name, but maybe it just means that there's room in the niche for more than one site?

August 23, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Good posts from Drama 2.0 and Omar Malik on the continuing commoditization of social network solutions. Note that I believe social networking is still a good thing to have -- it's just that it's not a "build it and they will come" solution. You need to have an actual plan on how you will attract & retain users, generate content, monetize your site, etc.

BTW, Drama 2.0's blog is pretty new, but he (she?) has been commenting on TechCrunch for a long time. And his (her?) posts are great, insightful stuff.

August 21, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]



 Tuesday, August 14, 2007
Big review on TechCrunch of 34 different white label social networking platforms. It's mostly a comparison chart, but it's still a ton of information. 
August 14, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Monday, August 13, 2007

One of the nice things about open source is you can build a site/web app quickly with it. But the downside is if you go with the vanilla install and only spend an hour or two customizing it, you don't have much to differentiate yourself from other sites using the same open source product.

For example, I've heard people complain about WordPress (open source blogging platform), saying that the sites you can make with it "all look like WordPress sites." I think that's true if you go with the same themes everyone else does. But with a little effort, your site can look totally unique.

When Mashable ran an article yesterday about Pligg being for sale, Pete Cashmore mentioned that "we get around 3 Pligg-powered sites submitted to Mashable every day." Obviously I don't see 3 Pligg-site reviews each day, so it means that most of them are turned down.

I asked Pete in the comments how he decides which ones (if any) to write about.

Me: Pete, out of curiosity, since there are so many submissions, how do you decide which ones to write about? Are most of the submissions vanilla installs with an hour or two of customization, and thus you write about the ones that are truly novel, or significantly enhanced, or are backed by an actual business/management unit?

Pete: Just answered your own question. ;)

Granted, my question was a bit leading, but I at least wanted some confirmation, correction, and/or elaboration.

August 13, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Sunday, August 12, 2007
10 open source social apps mentioned on Mashable. One I hadn't heard of .. MugShot. Well I heard of MugShot, but didn't know it was open source. ;)
August 12, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



Or at least Pligg.com is for sale.

 

Techcrunch and Mashable posted that Pligg is for sale, mainly because it was too much work for the current Pligg team to keep maintaining the code and community for free.

Pligg is an open source Digg clone that makes it easy to start your own social web site. Pligg has over 60,000 downloads, and many sites use it, but it's not like whomever buys it will sudden get to start charging current Pligg users.

Pligg is currently open source, and I assume that the current version of the source will have to stay that way. If the new owners try to charge money for it, someone will probably fork the current code to keep it free. Instead, the new owner will mainly get the Pligg web site, the forum, the Pligg name, and control of the current sourceforge repository. A good monetizing move might be to offer paid installation, support, and customization for open source software, something I've been doing more of personally at DevelopmentNow.

August 12, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Saturday, August 11, 2007

 

InvestingMinds is a new social network for serious investors. It features all the typical social network elements (friends, forums, groups, chat, IM, blogs, photos, etc.). InvestingMinds also offers a wiki where members can view and edit financial terms and information about their favorite stocks, plus users can create their own stock portfolios. Lastly, the site offers original content in its articles area.

 

August 11, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Thursday, August 09, 2007

 Sk*rt is a new (well, since may 07) social bookmarking site branded as a "Digg for women," allowing users to submit, rate, and comment stories & links in a variety of categories. It definitely has it's own bright, welcoming feel, as opposed to more tech-heavy sites like Digg, Slashdot, etc.

An interesting point is that Sk*rt is powered by Pligg, an open source Digg clone. Leveraging existing software allowed Sk*rt to get up & running very quickly, because instead of writing a lot of software, they could instead configure & rebrand Pligg.

skirt.PngHowever, Sk*rt has to make their source code available under Pligg's Affero license. They may not need to provide everything they've written, but certainly any modifications to Pligg's codebase would need to be provided, and I wonder if they would also need to open source their Pligg template, design, and any other addons.

Once again we see software as a commodity, and at least for Sk*rt (for now), their competitive advantage isn't their code. Instead it's their design, branding, marketing, content, user base, financials, and management.

After all, if all that mattered were code & features, the slew of Digg & MySpace clones would have already come to the forefront.

August 9, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Tuesday, August 07, 2007

TechCrunch had a great overview of some top turnkey SNS providers a week or so ago. They plan to also do a review soon of some downloadable solutions and custom providers.

The three loyal readers of my blog know I had a writeup a while back of free/cheap SNS tools. phpFox, Dolphin, & Handshakes are pretty popular. Elgg is big in the education field. Pligg (and its many cousins under the Affero GPL license) is more of a Digg clone, but people keep mentioning it. And there are a bunch more.

A lot of them are written in PHP, so if you're handy with code, you can often get open source platforms to do what you want/need them to do. But remember that if you use open source software as a foundation for your startup, you may be required to release any modifications you make to that codebase. Various factors affect that, of course.

Open source exists to help people ramp up & leverage the work of a community, but comes with a stipulation that if you modify and/or try to profit from that work, you often have to release your enhancements back to the community. That's not necessarily a bad thing, as long as your business plan takes that into account. There are plenty of companies who build or leverage open source, help the community, and yet still make money doing it.

August 7, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Friday, July 27, 2007

Marc Andreessen's synopsis of the facebook platform/API is a good read for would-be social developers. Not that developers are social, er, I mean developers for social networks.

Favorite quote from Marc's article (emphasis mine):

"[W]hen your application takes off on Facebook, you are very happy because you have lots of users, and you are very sad because your servers blow up."

He's referring to iLike's explosion in particular, but it's good to remember that if you introduce something compelling in a huge, extremely viral environment, you can get a lot of traffic very quickly. Probably a good idea to have the phone numbers of a few content delivery networks ready.

July 27, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Saw this small gem on my LinkedIn Answers network. Someone asked about developing widgets to be used in social networking platforms. Nice answer from Frank Speiser:

This isn't an answer to your specific question, but there's a lot to worry about with compliance for the various social networking platforms out there. Once you build it, you need to maintain it, which is easily more work than actually building it.

You'd do yourself a favor by integrating with Clearspring (www.clearspring.com), RockYou (www.rockyou.com) or Kickapps (www.kickapps.com) to manage the actual bridge to the social networks and community syndication sites. As a plus, these providers may be able to get you placement in widget galleries that you can not get for yourself.

July 18, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Another DIY SNS .... Nexo.
July 17, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



RWW has a blurb on DIY social networks (Ning, PeopleAggregator, and vibEngine).
July 17, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Thursday, June 21, 2007

List-y blog post today. Thx to John, Maddog, and other commenters at TechCrunch for some of the links.

And then I'll just add a lower-end turnkey, hosted Ning-esque option

Update: added Group Members International & YFonGlobal

June 21, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Wednesday, June 20, 2007
TechCrunch had a mini-review today about KickApps, a turnkey social networking service/platform that offers widgets, SNS hosting, and an open API.
June 20, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Friday, May 18, 2007

FYI I started up a new VSN on Ning called GeekBuddy. You can find it at geekbuddy.ning.com. I built it mostly to learn more about the Ning platform, since I think it'll be a viable candidate for people & organizations who want a straightforward, attractive, hosted social network. You can even request the source code (as I have) & make direct modifications. I'll post more thoughts on Ning as I work with it more, but for the time being, if you want to join the GeekBuddy network and say hello, that would be awesome. :)

There are at least two things about Ning that make it not right for everyone, though:

  1. It's a hosted solution, which means you don't have full control over performance, uptime, and upgrade schedule.
  2. You can't 100% remove all Ning.com branding (although you can remove a lot of it). So you don't have a fully-encapsulated user experience, and people will know you used Ning to make your site (which isn't necessarily bad).

For point #2, I think some people worry competitors will see that they used Ning & quickly crank out a clone. I don't think it's as much of an issue as one would think -- for example, no one has that concern about putting a forum on their web site, even though forum software is (now) easy to install.

If your competitors are smart, they probably already know about Ning or some other quick SNS solution. And since software is becoming increasingly commoditized, the way you beat your competitors isn't going to be the software -- it'll be things like your capital, partnerships, content, creativity, marketing, and any customizations you've made to the platform.

Of course, it would be better if your competitors didn't find out about how easy it was to make a social network, but anyhow...

May 18, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Wednesday, January 24, 2007

photobucket has a photo-sharing widget that you can plug into your site, allowing your web site visitors to upload, access, and share images from their Photobucket account.

Granted, users need a Photobucket account to use it ... I wonder if the widget makes it easy & transparent to sign up?

I posted this because MyPunchBowl lets you share photos from flickr, but if you don't have a flickr account, you're out of luck.

January 24, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Sunday, January 21, 2007

I was reading TechCrunch today and noticed an article about booBox, a lightbox product that allows Amazon affiliates to incorporate cool web-2.0 "popups" with Amazon.com products into their site. I often read about startups on TechCrunch, and sometimes I think to myself "man, I wish I had thought of that" or "man, I could do something like that."

Well, today the barrier to entry was so low that I came up with a competing product in under an hour. And not only that, but I'm offering three times the options! And did I mention it was free? So I give you ... the DevelopmentNow Amazon GreyBox!

For demo and code, go here.

This is a real life example of what I was getting at in my Social Networking for Sale post -- with rapid development techniques, open source software, and the huge availability of turnkey widgets, code samples, and solutions, product development is becoming increasingly commoditized, allowing the easy output of "close enough clones." A previous employer had experience with a competitor whose product was "close enough" to be a real competitive threat, and so winning clients was less about the actual product than the strength of the team, marketing, PR, customer service, existing client list, and sales power.

So do I think that I'll be a serious competitor for booBox? Probably not, unless I put together a hip-looking web site, send out press releases, work the conferences, etc. And competing with them wasn't really the point. Rather, since Mike Arrington gave booBox "an early thumbs up" and said it "may be quick acquisition bait for Amazon or eBay," it seems there's potential gold even for quickly-developed apps.

Granted, I were serious (or smart?), I probably should have said my product took weeks/months to develop, not minutes/hours. And instead of using my product to prove a point on the commoditization of software in a little-read blog, I should have instead used it to go for either some web 2.0 notoriety and/or a quick-hit acquisition. But ah well. :)

booBox

booBox

DevelopmentNow's Amazon GreyBox

product link

mini link

related products

January 21, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Monday, January 15, 2007

Well, I may have to start up a social networking category. I ran across Shuzak, a "social network for geeks." While the idea of niche-based social networks (or vertical social networks: VSNs) isn't a stunner, it doesn't seem very common yet. I'm sure we'll see many more in the upcoming year.

Shuzak seems interesting, but at first blush it feels less like a targeted MySpace and more like a BBS with extended user profiles. Like a custom Zoints Local app. I do like the fact that they're not just a generic social network, though ... they have a few features specific to their theme (e.g. syntactical code highlighting, mathematical equation formatting). I could maybe see this taking off in a university, allowing professors to set up private, invitation-only "classroom social networks" to allow their students to collaborate on projects, exchange notes, ask questions, etc. There ya go, Shuzak, I just gave you your in. :) Ofc, you probably already thought of that.

Anyhow, when one (like me) talks about a social network being a BBS with better profiles, is that a bad thing? How exactly does one define a social network? Is it features, e.g. profiles, groups, and buddy lists? Or is it purpose, e.g. exchange ideas, send messages, meet people? And if it's purpose, does that purpose have to be intentional (e.g. using eHarmony to find dates), or can it be incidental, as with the countless friendships forged in MMORPGs? Could you argue that other, existing sites that are centered around communication (forums, social bookmarking sites that allow comments) are social networks, too? Mashable sure did by mentioning Digg as a techie social network.

I will say, though, that looking enough "like MySpace or Facebook" will probably make it easier to get funded.

January 15, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]



 Sunday, January 14, 2007

As I mentioned in Social Networking for Sale, I believe social networking software/sites (SNS) will become pretty commoditized in 2007. It's already pretty cheap & easy to get your own community site.

For example, there's Scuttle, open source social bookmarking software. If you need social networking software (a la MySpace), you can find it for free/open source with Alicia (aka PHPizabi) or AroundMe or osDate or Yogurt or Dolphin.

If you want a fancier MySpace clone you can spend $300 or so for phpFox or Handshakes or BuddyZone or webNetwork or Elgg Spaces or SocialEngine or a dozen others. 

There are also hosted, turnkey solutions like PeopleAggregator, Me.com, NingPringo, KickApps, and others, which offer plans ranging from free to paid.

There's also a social networking addon for vBulletin called Zoints Local -- plug it into your existing vBulletin site and bingo! instant "community."

And of course there are "community" addons for CMS+ platforms such as phpNuke, Joomla (Community Builder), Drupal, etc. allowing you to truly build your own SNS. One could also do it by hand using Rails or some other rapid dev platform.

No matter which option you choose, you have a number of customization options, not all of which require a programmer.

The point of all those links is to reinforce the fact that there's already a slew of cheap starting points for a social community site for would-be MySpace topplers. I figure there will eventually be a number of vertical social networks (VSNs) for gamers, hobbyists, flyfishermen, cheerleaders, etc. Maybe they'll be within MySpace, or maybe third party sites. Better yet would be if VSNs could integrate with people's existing social networks elsewhere on MySpace, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc, so that you don't have to abandon your friends, profile, and blog posts to tap into a more targeted community. People would be more likely to join a new social network if they didn't have to reupload all their photos, reanswer all their profile questions, etc.

PHPizabi Alicia

 

Boonex Dolphin
dolphin.png

OSDate
osdate.png

Zoints Local
Zoints Local

January 14, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]



 Thursday, January 04, 2007

I've been talking with different clients about building social networking sites. What I'm hearing more is the interest in specialized or vertical social networks (VSNs). Then what I hear is "so, how much would it cost to build a web 2.0 social network for <insert niche here>?" The answer is: it's getting cheaper all the time. The second, less-expected answer? That cheaper-to-build social networking sites isn't necessarily good news for would-be MySpace killers.

Interestingly, I noticed that mashable had a link indicating that ruduzu, the "anti-social networking site", is for sale. The winning bidder gets all the code, the existing community (all 273 of 'em), and one year of hosting. So far the bid is up to $3,800 with 15 days to go, so it's possible that potential MySpace killers can get their very own social site for well under $10,000!

I do think that plug & play social networking features (social widgets?) might be more popular in 2007. TechCrunch already talked about a comment system that could be quickly embedded in any site. I blogged about Plaxo's Address Book Widget making it easy to add all your buddies to a new social web site (and I wouldn't mind being able to import actual buddies from other social networks, too). So I'm sure we'll see other widgets (instant photo gallery! instant blog! instant buddy list!) this year, along with a huge crop of rapidly developed (and probably rapidly abandoned) "web 2.0" sites.

Thus comes my real point -- I think the base technology is becoming more of a commodity. I believe it's getting easier than ever to develop software and web sites, and developers are more reluctant to reinvent the wheel. Which IMO means two things

  • the barrier to entry for crappy "me too!" sites will continue to get lower
  • the differentiators will be (as in the past):
    • continual improvement & innovation
    • ability to raise and manage capital
    • ability to market and make deals
    • ability to serve up interesting content 
    • hard, continued work

So in 2007, if you wanted to knock out a quick & dirty MySpace clone in a few weeks, you probably could. You could make a Google Maps mashup in under a week. Maybe even build a deli.cio.us knockoff in a few days.

But if you want those sites to be something other than resume fodder, expect to put in some hard time. The days of "build it and they will come" are gone. If they ever existed at all.

January 4, 2007    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]