home · blog · groups · about us · contact us
DevelopmentNow Blog
 Thursday, November 30, 2006
 
 

In the past I blogged about cheap easy offsite backups. Back then I wasn't really looking at Amazon's S3 (Simple Storage Service), but now I realize that it might make for a nice additional backup. I'm still using Mozy for images and videos, but I'd like a better place to store my database dumps, etc than uploading them via FTP to an ISP.

Joseph Scott has an interesting post on comparing storing files on Dreamhost vs S3. One thing I think he's leaving out is the chance that if you fill up your 200gb account at Dreamhost, they might not like that. Jeremy Zawodny has a list of S3 backup tools -- be sure to read the comments for other suggestions, too.

November 30, 2006    Bookmark to Digg or other social bookmarking
#    Disclaimer  |  Comments [3]

Related posts:
Roll Back Subversion Files to a Previous Version
Unfuddle Ticket Submission Form
How to Lose 20 Dollars an Hour
10 Articles All Bloggers Should Read
Excel Scrolling Tales from IM
PMARCA


« Import Email Addresses and Contacts into... | Main | AJAx Timeline Widget »
Friday, December 01, 2006 7:39:48 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
DreamHost would be a crappy backup solution if you care about your data. Having used them for over 2 years now I can say without a doubt they're unreliable; they certainly offer a lot of control and they're very cheap, but I'd never host mission-critical stuff with them. And you're right, once you start hitting the limits with DH they tend to balk -- just ask Warren Ellis: http://www.warrenellis.com/?p=3327

Mozy looks interesting -- how long have you been using them?
Friday, December 01, 2006 8:28:12 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
I agree with you on all those points.

I've been using Mozy for maybe 3-4 months. Their backup agent is very easy to use, very "set it & forget it", and you can configure it to only upload at certain times, or only use a certain amount of bandwidth, or only start backing up if you've been idle for a while or whatever. So it's very polite & configurable. Several other services I've tried (not to say I've tried everything, ofc), sucked by comparison.

That ease of use, plus the fact that they're not super expensive, was big for me. There are cheaper providers, but $50/year vs $30/year vs free/year wasn't as important to me as finding a solution that wasn't going to take me hours to set up or slow down my computer all the time.

My two biggest complaints about Mozy are 1) they don't support backups on servers, and 2) they don't compress files before uploading. Both issues aren't really a big deal for most consumers (whose largest files they're backing up are uncompressable pictures and videos), but are an annoyance for "business" type users like me. They don't have a Mac client, either, which they're supposedly working on but probably not too hard.
Friday, December 01, 2006 8:40:50 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
test
Comments are closed.