Amy:
It would help us all if you used similar terminology. Let me explain:
A table is an object in a database that holds records/rows of information.
A table is a collection of records or rows.
A row/record is an object in a database that holds relivate information
(divided up into fields) about an "entity." A row is a collection of
fields.
Now, in DTS you will be transforming from a source to destination. A source
can be a table or rowset (subset of or selection from a "table") and the
destination will be a table.
Now that that is clear, what are you trying to do? E.G. Your statement that
you are trying to do a "many source fields into separate records in one
field" doesn't make sense using the above object heirarchy. Tables contain
rows/records which contain fields. Fields don't contain records. What it
sounds like you want is a one to many relationship which requires two tables
and a foreign key to join them. If that is what you want, you will have to
use a lookup (if it has to be done with only one data pump) because you have
one source table and two destination tables.
Unfortunately, I will not be able to respond till Monday. Maybe if you can
describe what you are trying using the above terminology, someone may be
able to pick up where I left off. Otherwise, I'll check back on Monday to
assist you further.
Scott
[quoted text, click to view] "Amy" <amygerst@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1105134053.178658.312160@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Thank You for your response, I think this will help, however, I am not
> trying to merge the source fields into one record, I am trying to but
> many source fields into separate records in one field. Would I still
> use the same process you gave me? Sorry, to sound so ignorant...I have
> been trying to figure this out for so long, my mind is no longer
> working. Thank you again for your help.
>