It looks like all the rows were successfully processed. My concern still is
account for these rows not showing up. Can you confirm this?
"CTS_DBA" <CTSDBA@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:C30E750E-A7CD-45F0-8699-8D96E32DDFAB@microsoft.com...
> Re-organize has been completed. But still no luck. And there is nothing in
> the gatherer logs as well. See below from the gatherer logs for the
> entries
> from re-organize and re-building I did today.
>
> RE_BUILDING
>
> 2006-11-29 09:28:15.58 spid20s Informational: Full-text Full
> population
> completed for table or indexed view '[CI_InvTest].[dbo].[Addresses]'
> (table
> or indexed view ID '101575400', database ID '41'). Number of documents
> processed: 10038019. Number of documents failed: 0. Number of documents
> need
> retry: 0.
>
> 2006-11-29 09:28:15.58 spid20s Changing the status to MERGE for
> full-text catalog "cat_Addresses_AI" (7) in database "CI_InvTest" (41).
> This
> is an informational message only. No user action is required.
>
> 2006-11-29 09:28:16.89 spid20s Informational: Full-text Auto
> population
> initialized for table or indexed view '[CI_InvTest].[dbo].[Addresses]'
> (table
> or indexed view ID '101575400', database ID '41'). Population sub-tasks:
> 1.
>
>
>
>
>
> RE-ORGANIZING
>
> 2006-11-29 09:38:21.04 spid56 Changing the status to MERGE for
> full-text catalog "cat_Addresses_AI" (7) in database "CI_InvTest" (41).
> This
> is an informational message only. No user action is required.
>
>
> --
> CTS DBA
>
>
> "CTS_DBA" wrote:
>
>> Thanks Hilary,
>>
>> SELECT fulladdress FROM [dbo].[Addresses] WHERE FullAddress like
>> '%WARMINSTER%' and not like '% WARMINSTER %'
>>
>> The Query returns only 4 records which means still so many records
>> missing
>> in the SQL 2005 FT catalog. I have started the re-organize (ALTER
>> FULLTEXT
>> CATALOG cat_Addresses REORGANIZE) and update you with the results when it's
>> completed.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> CTS DBA
>>
>>
>> "Hilary Cotter" wrote:
>>
>> > I've had problems on very large databases with this. I think we were
>> > over
>> > 400,000,000 rows when we first noticed it. A reorganize would normally
>> > help.
>> >
>> > Can you first run this query?
>> >
>> > SELECT fulladdress FROM [dbo].[Addresses] WHERE FullAddress like
>> > '%WARMINSTER%' and not like '% WARMINSTER %'
>> >
>> > See if perhaps you are getting hits to Warministershireontheavon or
>> > something like that. Note that most punctuation will be ignored.
>> >
>> > If you are trully missing hits can you check the gatherer log to see if
>> > there are any error messages?
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Hilary Cotter
>> >
>> > Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
>> >
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html >> >
>> > Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
>> >
http://www.indexserverfaq.com >> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "CTS_DBA" <CTSDBA@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> > news:0E0072FB-B92A-4E2C-9915-99D0667C0BCA@microsoft.com...
>> > > we have created a full text catalogue on an Addresses table with
>> > > exactly
>> > > same
>> > > configuration on 3 databases. Two of them are on SQL 2005 and one on
>> > > SQL
>> > > 2000.
>> > >
>> > > My Addresses table has 13 million rows and the full text was on the
>> > > Full
>> > > Address column.
>> > >
>> > > db is around 250GB
>> > >
>> > > FT Index on SQL 2005 database was created very quickly (within 2
>> > > hours)
>> > > while SQL 2000 FT took 30 hours.
>> > >
>> > > But my issue is SQL 2005 index does not contain all the words. For an
>> > > example following 2 queries gives me the exactly same number on the
>> > > SQL
>> > > 2000
>> > > database while on SQL 2005, first query only return 11 and the 2nd
>> > > one 274
>> > > (274 is same on 2000 server/database as well)
>> > >
>> > > SELECT count(*)
>> > >
>> > > FROM [dbo].[Addresses]
>> > >
>> > > WHERE CONTAINS(FullAddress, 'WARMINSTER')
>> > >
>> > > GO
>> > >
>> > > SELECT count(*)
>> > >
>> > > FROM [dbo].[Addresses]
>> > >
>> > > WHERE FullAddress like '%WARMINSTER%'
>> > >
>> > > Is this a bug?
>> > >
>> > > When i extracted the records which should have retrived in to a
>> > > seperate
>> > > table (few hundred records) and created a FT index on that it works
>> > > fine.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > CTS DBA
>> >
>> >
>> >