"Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cotter@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23tA%23hgWIGHA.1388@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Do the gatherer logs reflect the population starting. Note that change
> tracking should work better for you.

>
> --
> Hilary Cotter
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
>
> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
> http://www.indexserverfaq.com
>
> "tshad" <tfs@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
> news:eWc7XYWIGHA.740@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > Running on Sql Server 2000, I have a catalog set to do an incremental
> > populate every 5 minutes each day.
> >
> > But when I make a change to a record and do a search on it, it doesn't
> > find
> > it, even after about 20 minutes. But if I manually do the incremental
> > population, it then works.
> >
> > Why wouldn't the schedular work?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
>
>

"tshad" <tfs@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
news:eWc7XYWIGHA.740@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Running on Sql Server 2000, I have a catalog set to do an incremental
> populate every 5 minutes each day.
>
> But when I make a change to a record and do a search on it, it doesn't
> find
> it, even after about 20 minutes. But if I manually do the incremental
> population, it then works.
>
> Why wouldn't the schedular work?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom
>
>