|
|
You're in the
sql server full text search
group:freetexttable bug
sql server full text search:
We've been using the catalog as part of our search engine for a year now. We use freetexttable to search for keywords and it is fine until now. For some reason the 'freetexttable' is inconsistent. I tried this query and I got a lot of rows. select * from tb_catalog where content like '%AT&T%' When I try this, I dont get anything. select * from freetexttable(tb_catalog, *, 'AT&T') But when I try this, I got rows. select * from freetexttable(tb_catalog, *, 'SB&C') So I thought it is just an ampersand issue but it worked in the last query. Any thoughts are really appreciated. Great Thanks, Baldwin MISICompany
I've repro'd this. It could be by design, I'll raise it internally and see
if it is a bug. -- RelevantNoise.com - dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. Looking for a SQL Server replication book? http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS http://www.indexserverfaq.com [quoted text, click to view] "Baldwin" <ibaldwinjr@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1192202141.265102.33850@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > Hi, > > We've been using the catalog as part of our search engine for a year > now. We use freetexttable to search for keywords and it is fine until > now. For some reason the 'freetexttable' is inconsistent. > > I tried this query and I got a lot of rows. > select * from tb_catalog > where content like '%AT&T%' > > When I try this, I dont get anything. > select * from freetexttable(tb_catalog, *, 'AT&T') > > But when I try this, I got rows. > select * from freetexttable(tb_catalog, *, 'SB&C') > > So I thought it is just an ampersand issue but it worked in the last > query. > > Any thoughts are really appreciated. > > Great Thanks, > Baldwin > MISICompany >
duh silly me. You need to remove AT from your noise word list and then
rebuild your catalog. -- RelevantNoise.com - dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. Looking for a SQL Server replication book? http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS http://www.indexserverfaq.com [quoted text, click to view] "Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cotter@gmail.com> wrote in message news:enGf5gGEIHA.4772@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > I've repro'd this. It could be by design, I'll raise it internally and see > if it is a bug. > > -- > RelevantNoise.com - dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. > > Looking for a SQL Server replication book? > http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html > > Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS > http://www.indexserverfaq.com > "Baldwin" <ibaldwinjr@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:1192202141.265102.33850@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com... >> Hi, >> >> We've been using the catalog as part of our search engine for a year >> now. We use freetexttable to search for keywords and it is fine until >> now. For some reason the 'freetexttable' is inconsistent. >> >> I tried this query and I got a lot of rows. >> select * from tb_catalog >> where content like '%AT&T%' >> >> When I try this, I dont get anything. >> select * from freetexttable(tb_catalog, *, 'AT&T') >> >> But when I try this, I got rows. >> select * from freetexttable(tb_catalog, *, 'SB&C') >> >> So I thought it is just an ampersand issue but it worked in the last >> query. >> >> Any thoughts are really appreciated. >> >> Great Thanks, >> Baldwin >> MISICompany >> > >
[quoted text, click to view]
On Oct 17, 7:27 am, "Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cot...@gmail.com> wrote: > duh silly me. You need to remove AT from your noise word list and then > rebuild your catalog. > > -- > RelevantNoise.com - dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. > > Looking for a SQL Server replication book?http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html > > Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTShttp://www.indexserverfaq.com"Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cot...@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:enGf5gGEIHA.4772@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > > > > I've repro'd this. It could be by design, I'll raise it internally and see > > if it is a bug. > > > -- > > RelevantNoise.com - dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. > > > Looking for a SQL Server replication book? > >http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html > > > Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS > >http://www.indexserverfaq.com > > "Baldwin" <ibaldwi...@gmail.com> wrote in message > >news:1192202141.265102.33850@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > >> Hi, > > >> We've been using the catalog as part of our search engine for a year > >> now. We use freetexttable to search for keywords and it is fine until > >> now. For some reason the 'freetexttable' is inconsistent. > > >> I tried this query and I got a lot of rows. > >> select * from tb_catalog > >> where content like '%AT&T%' > > >> When I try this, I dont get anything. > >> select * from freetexttable(tb_catalog, *, 'AT&T') > > >> But when I try this, I got rows. > >> select * from freetexttable(tb_catalog, *, 'SB&C') > > >> So I thought it is just an ampersand issue but it worked in the last > >> query. > > >> Any thoughts are really appreciated. > > >> Great Thanks, > >> Baldwin > >> MISICompany- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Thanks for the reply. But I dont think I want to do that. If I removed the "AT" from the list of noise words, I can now search for "AT". The other thing is, is the "&" was converted to space or something that the search engine now is looking for "AT" and "T" but both are considered as noise words thus not returning anything as oppose to considering the AT&T as one word. take note that there is no space between letters - "AT&T". is there a way we can use an escape character for "&" so the search engine will consider AT&T as one word? thanks really for the help. Baldwin
No, unfortunately not.
-- RelevantNoise.com - dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. Looking for a SQL Server replication book? http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS http://www.indexserverfaq.com [quoted text, click to view] "Baldwin" <ibaldwinjr@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1192652305.771160.110030@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 17, 7:27 am, "Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cot...@gmail.com> wrote: >> duh silly me. You need to remove AT from your noise word list and then >> rebuild your catalog. >> >> -- >> RelevantNoise.com - dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. >> >> Looking for a SQL Server replication >> book?http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html >> >> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL >> FTShttp://www.indexserverfaq.com"Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cot...@gmail.com> >> wrote in message >> >> news:enGf5gGEIHA.4772@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> >> >> >> > I've repro'd this. It could be by design, I'll raise it internally and >> > see >> > if it is a bug. >> >> > -- >> > RelevantNoise.com - dedicated to mining blogs for business >> > intelligence. >> >> > Looking for a SQL Server replication book? >> >http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html >> >> > Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS >> >http://www.indexserverfaq.com >> > "Baldwin" <ibaldwi...@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >news:1192202141.265102.33850@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com... >> >> Hi, >> >> >> We've been using the catalog as part of our search engine for a year >> >> now. We use freetexttable to search for keywords and it is fine until >> >> now. For some reason the 'freetexttable' is inconsistent. >> >> >> I tried this query and I got a lot of rows. >> >> select * from tb_catalog >> >> where content like '%AT&T%' >> >> >> When I try this, I dont get anything. >> >> select * from freetexttable(tb_catalog, *, 'AT&T') >> >> >> But when I try this, I got rows. >> >> select * from freetexttable(tb_catalog, *, 'SB&C') >> >> >> So I thought it is just an ampersand issue but it worked in the last >> >> query. >> >> >> Any thoughts are really appreciated. >> >> >> Great Thanks, >> >> Baldwin >> >> MISICompany- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Thanks for the reply. But I dont think I want to do that. If I removed > the "AT" from the list of noise words, I can now search for "AT". > > The other thing is, is the "&" was converted to space or something > that the search engine now is looking for "AT" and "T" but both are > considered as noise words thus not returning anything as oppose to > considering the AT&T as one word. take note that there is no space > between letters - "AT&T". is there a way we can use an escape > character for "&" so the search engine will consider AT&T as one word? > > thanks really for the help. > Baldwin >
Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.
|
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
| home · blog · groups | Questions? Comments? Contact the dn |