Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately I forgot that I had posted this thread.
not developed the software. There are a couple of services that support the
software that are running which are most likely interacting with the DB.
The users here do not use the desktop clients. So the only thing I can see
users are not logged in to the desktop clients(this is live chat software).
TM reports 35 minutes of CPU time. The other instances DB size is has a DB
"Andrea Montanari" <andrea.sqlDMO@virgilio.it> wrote in message
news:4cj8c1F15qhf6U1@individual.net...
> hi Tom,
> Tom Libby wrote:
>> We have 2 instances of MSDE 2000 SP3 on a W2K Advanced server with 1
>> Gig of memory. One for an online storefront and the other for live
>> chat software from SightMax.com. The live chat instance which is
>> really not being used since the users never log into the software
>> starts to use over a gig of virtual memory. The online storefront
>> gets used all day and does not have this problem. Any suggestions as
>> to what to do about it.
>> Sorry if this is a basic question but I am not that familiar with
>> administration of SQL Server or MSDE.
>>
>
> are you really sure the "unused" insntance is really unused? when starting
> up on my system with "default" memory configuration, that's to say dynamic
> automatic management, the 1st instance adds about 34mb of ram, and a 2nd
> instance another 12mb of physical memory...
> virtual memory is reserved for both intances but not allocated.. it
> actually becomes allocated when needed..
> Loosely speaking, SQL Server organize it's memory allocation in two
> distinct
> regions, the "buffer pool" (BPool) and the "memory to leave" (MemToLeave)
> regions. (I'm excluding use of AWE in order to provide easy understanding
> and because MSDE does not admit it)..
> so... the BPool is the primary region SQL Server uses for it's internal
> matter, while MemToLeave consists of the virtual memory space within the
> 1gb
> user mode address space and the memory not used by the BPool.
>
> when SQL Server starts, it begins calculating the upper limit the BPool
> can
> reach... if no MaxMemory is set, this value will be set to the amount of
> the
> physical memory or the size of the user mode address space (1gb) , minus
> the
> size of the MemToLeave, whichever is less..
>
> by default, MemToLeave is set to 384mb, 128mb of them are for worker
> thread
> stacks and 256mb for allocation outside the BPool, such as memory for
> OLE-DB
> providers, linked server drivers, NetLib dlls, in process COM objects
> space
> and memory requirements and so on..
> when MaxMemory value is explicitally set, this upper limit will only
> address
> BPool region needs...
> so only the address space of BPool pages is limited by this configuration
> value, while SQL Server memory requirememts outside BPool allocation are
> not
> limited this way...
>
> more, each connection, live or sleeping, will eat about 24kb of memory,
> calculated as 12 KB + 3 times the Network Packet Size (default setting
> that
> can be partially customized via sp_configure system stored procedure
> modifying the 'user connections' setting), used to store the data
> structures
> holding the connection 's context, as long as for buffer used to send and
> receive the relative associated network streams (default to 4KB network
> packet setting), that can be stolen from the buffer pool memory region
> and/or the MemToLeave memory area...
>
> not limiting the resources, SQL Server can reclaim that memory (up to 1
> gb,
> in our example) for it's uses, and it will perhaps release it only under
> pressure by the OS claiming for additional memory, if it's the case, else
> it
> will maintain that memory in order to cache pages and execution plans...
> under OS pressure, SQL Server will try having the Lazy Writer releasing
> resources, but you are not granted that this will occur, even if SQL
> Server
> will always try to leave some memory for other OS needs, usually between 4
> and 10mb of RAM... so, on SQL Server dedicated servers, you usually see
> memory usage climbing to the top and staying there for long time, becouse
> of
> SQL Server tends to keep pages read from disk in memory to increase
> further
> and successive access to those pages, as long as query plans and so on...
> but on "inactive" instance, this should not be the case...
> --
> Andrea Montanari (Microsoft MVP - SQL Server)
>
http://www.asql.biz/DbaMgr.shtm http://italy.mvps.org > DbaMgr2k ver 0.18.0 - DbaMgr ver 0.62.0
> (my vb6+sql-dmo little try to provide MS MSDE 1.0 and MSDE 2000 a visual
> interface)
> --------- remove DMO to reply
>
>
>