> Keith,
>
> Thank you, that was very helpful. I noticed that pricing was per
> processor.
> Do you know if I can utilize 1 or 2 of the processors (there by purchasing
> only 1 or 2 processor licenses rather than purchasing 4 processor
> licenses)
> to run the system?
>
> Thanks again, Aaron
>
> "Keith Kratochvil" wrote:
>
>> By "synchronize" I assume that you mean "replicate." I am guessing that
>> the
>> standard edition of SQL Server would work just fine. You could pay the
>> big
>> bucks for the Enterprise edition if you want. You might be able to use
>> the
>> Workgroup Edition. I don't have much experience with that edition of SQL
>> Server because it was recently released.
>>
>> Here is a grid that compares the features by edition:
>> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluation/features/choosing.asp
>>
>> --
>> Keith
>>
>>
>> "AaronJ" <AaronJ@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:9A3D3FBD-46FD-4DB6-894A-0744219DADD1@microsoft.com...
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am unsure which version I need to purchase? I want to have the
>> > ability
>> > to
>> > synchronize a remote server with a local server. Here are my specs:
>> >
>> > Windows 2000 SP4
>> > Management Console v1.2 SP4
>> > C drive: 12G Total, 6G free
>> > D drive: 90G total, 66G free
>> > 4 physical hard disks in a RAID configuration.
>> >
>> > Any Ideas?
>> >
>> > Thanks, Aaron
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>

"AaronJ" <AaronJ@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:68A4263E-8C85-4D13-9DC7-78E37A2EEF6E@microsoft.com...
> Keith,
>
> Thank you, that was very helpful. I noticed that pricing was per
> processor.
> Do you know if I can utilize 1 or 2 of the processors (there by purchasing
> only 1 or 2 processor licenses rather than purchasing 4 processor
> licenses)
> to run the system?
>
> Thanks again, Aaron