On Oct 13, 1:40 am, Ekrem =D6nsoy <ek...@btegitim.com> wrote:
> You can install SQL Server 2005 EE on a Windows Server 2003 SE, however as
> Andrew mentioned, if you puspose is developing applications or testing th=
en
> you can use Developer Edition instead of Enterprise Edition. Developer
> Edition has all the capabilities and features that EE has.
>
> --
> Ekrem =D6nsoy
>
> <lstandri...@cnitucson.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1192225767.716508.271970@t8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 12, 2:32 pm, Ekrem =D6nsoy <ek...@btegitim.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > You can not install SQL Server 2005 EE on Windows Vista nor XP.
>
> > You can install Express, Standard and Developer Editions on Vista \ XP.
>
> > You may want to know about Requirements of SQL Server from the following
> > list:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143506.aspx >
> > --
> > Ekrem =D6nsoy
>
> > <lstandri...@cnitucson.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:1192208793.946529.205890@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > >I have been trying to install SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition on a
> > > Vista OS and am having a problem. After the install and the sp2
> > > install, there is no instance of SQL Server running. I am new to SQL
> > > Server (most of my experence is with Oracle) but I believe this to be
> > > an incomplete installiation problem. I have tried everything I can
> > > come up with to start an instance with out any luck.
>
> > > Any suggestions?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> I was afraid that was the answer. I have seen the system requirements
> page before but I have also seen other microsoft pages that said it
> was compatible using the sp2 for SQL 2005. Even the warning when
> installing says to install the sp2 before using. Just to verify, I
> should be OK if I get Server 2003 Standard and use it instead of Vista?- =
Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -