To be honest I don't know what the current recommendations are for swap file
size on the different OS anymore. But it should not generally be a factor
for SQL Server since SQL Server tries very hard to not force the OS to swap
due to its memory requirements. It will give back memory to the OS instead
of forcing it to swap. With 2GB of memory you should not be swapping to disk
that much anyway. I have 2GB on my laptop and I usually have several
instances of SQL Server and other apps running and my swap file is only set
to 2GB.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
[quoted text, click to view] "Greg Lumpkin" <gclumpkin@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Oqcg3OmNHHA.5104@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> All:
>
> I have a Pentium 4 2.2 GHz laptop with 512 MB of RAM. I installed SQL
> Server 2005 Express Advanced Edition on it last night and it said that my
> hardware wasn't optimal for the installation.
>
> After looking at upgrades this morning, I have decided to max out the RAM
> to 2048 MB to see if that will improve performance.
>
> My question is this (and it may be off topic and if so, I apologize), what
> Virtual Memory swap file size would you suggest I set Windows XP to? I'm
> sure it is currently set to start at 1.5x RAM (768MB) and stop at 3x RAM
> (1536 MB).
>
> Since the machine will have 2048 MB, should I just set a static swap file
> for 4096 MB (the limit with XP) or would it be better to set it for System
> Managed Size.
>
> I'm posting to this group since I am a SQL Server newbie and thought
> someone else might have input from experience.
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>