Joe,
In answer to your questions:
1.) SQL-NS 2005 offers several feature enhancements over SQL-NS 2000, as
well as performance, reliability, and security improvements. The list of new
features includes a management tool integrated into SQL Management Studio,
an Analysis Services event provider, support for end-user defined matching
rules, a management API, and more. As far as performance goes, we have made
several enhancements and in all scenarios, you should expect the same or
better performance than SQL-NS 2000.
2.) The following whitepaper should give you an idea of the performance you
can expect out of SQL-NS 2000:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnsql2k/html/sql_nsperformance.asp?_r=1
We do not yet have numbers published for SQL-NS 2005 - those will be
available closer to the release.
Overall, you should be aware that SQL-NS was specifically designed to scale
well in high-volume applications. It has been deployed successfully in many
real-life production environments, from low volume (thousands of
events/subscriptions/notifications) to high volume (millions to tens of
millions of events/subscriptions/notifications) applications. So far, we
have not yet seen an application where SQL-NS performance does not meet
expectations.
Hope this helps
-shyam
--
Learn more about SQL-NS:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0672326647/ ---------------------------------------------
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm. ---------------------------------------------
[quoted text, click to view] <joearnone@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110296529.142959.304020@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Two Questions;
>
> 1) Are there any differences between MS Notification Services that will
> ship w/ SQL2005 as opposed to notification services that is available
> for SQL2K?
>
> 2) I'm interested to know the kind of performance, reliability and
> maximum throughput that can be expected in the current implementation
> of notification svcs. Has anyone had any experiences good or bad?
>
> Any comments are greatly appreciated.
>
> Joe Arnone
> Arizona Public Service Company
>