Subscription Management function calls. That way, your current
subscription management app can remain on the v1.1 framework.
I support PASS, the Professional Association for SQL Server.
<kjackson@powerwayinc.com> wrote:
>
>Yes unfortunately, we cannot upgrade out subscription management application
>to 2.0 at this time as it calls 1.1 components from our application and it
>can't be upgraded for 6-7 months.
>
>We decided to host a SQL Server 2000 instance for the notification system.
>Microsoft's licensing agreement is such that we would need to pay a license
>either way.
>
>"Joe Webb" <joew@webbtechsolutions.com> wrote in message
>news:41drv1pdr19di2f5o27tjs2kijfekkk150@4ax.com...
>> Well, if you've install SQL Server 2005, you already have v2.0 of the
>> .NET Framework.
>>
>> Is the issue is that you cannot upgrade your Subscription Management
>> Application to Framework v2.0 for some reason? If that it, one
>> possbility is that you can use SQLNS 2005 and then create a web
>> service in v2.0 of the .NET Framework to expose WebMethods for
>> subscription management interfaces. Your Sub Mgt App can then use the
>> web service interface to manage subscriptions, subscribers, etc.
>>
>> HTH...
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Joe Webb
>> SQL Server MVP
>>
http://www.sqlns.com >>
>>
>> ~~~
>> Get up to speed quickly with SQLNS
>>
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0972688811 >>
>> I support PASS, the Professional Association for SQL Server.
>> (
www.sqlpass.org)
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:56:42 -0500, "Kevin Jackson"
>> <kjackson@powerwayinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>We are using SQL Server Notifications Services 2.0 which comes with SQL
>>>Server 2000. We have upgraded to SQL Server 2005 but cannot yet use the
>>>notifications services that come with 2005 yet because we cannot switch
>>>over
>>>to the .NET 2.0 Framework.
>>>
>>>Is it possible to host the NS 2.0 database on SQL Server 2005? Will the
>>>utility that creates the NS 2.0 database work when pointed to SQL Server
>>>2005.
>>>
>>>We don't want to have to run a SQL Server 2000 database server if at all
>>>possible.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>Kevin Jackson
>>>