sql server odbc:
[quoted text, click to view] "Brad Pears" <donotreply@notreal.com> wrote in message
news:%23Ro9ZTTvEHA.612@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> I am converting an Access 2000 app to use SQL server instead of access
> tables.
>
> There is a lot of work ahead to get it where I really want it - especially
> after browsing this newsgroup and doing some research.
>
> I will be using SQL pass-through queries to replace the existence of link
> tables - specifically for the tables that currently contain thousands of
> records.
>
> Currrently, I have forms/reports that are based on Access tables. Will I
> then have to modify these objects so that they are based on the new pass
> through queries I will be developing?
In my Access app, I have used Access Query objects, as SQL Pass-Throughs, as
the RecordSource for dropdowns and reports. For bound forms, it might not
work as well. I don't think the data is updateable.
[quoted text, click to view] > Also, since I am communicating directly with SQL server, am I to assume
that
> Access SQL will not alwyas work anymore and I must use the Transact SQL
that
> SQL server uses?
Absolutely! Pass-Through means the SQL will be sent directly to the server,
so it must use syntax the server understands. When using ODBC, the ODBC
driver translates Access SQL for you. See my reply to a previous post of
yours for more details.
[quoted text, click to view] > One more question...
>
> When creating recordsets etc... in Access, what is the best method to use
> when connecting via ODBC to SQL server? The use of ADO recordsets or is
> there something better than that for SQL server?
IMHO ADO is best.
[quoted text, click to view] >
> Thanks,
>
> Brad
>
>