Thanks for the pointer. I had missed that part. We're using Windows Server
Guess I'm gonna have to use WINS anyway. Bummer...
"Terry" <ttrapp.spam.me.not@org.insurors.r3m0v3m3> wrote in message
news:7435b$42c053cf$45264c04$28656@NEWSOUTH.NET...
> Cluster Nodes and Windows Domains
>
> All nodes in the cluster must be members of the same domain and able to
> access a domain controller and a Domain Name System (DNS) server, as well
as
> a WINS server. The nodes should not be configured as domain controllers if
> you are going to install SQL Server, as you may encounter some problems,
> including the fact that domain controller functionality (such as Active
> Directory) is not cluster aware, so all information will be local. This
> impacts things such as a directory enabled program's ability to publish
> under the virtual server's computer object, which does not work in a
> cluster. A WINS server is still required for Windows 2000/SQL Server 2000
in
> a clustered environment if name resolution of virtual resource is
required.
>
>
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/maintain/failclus.mspx >
> "Patrick Peters" <patrick.peters@orametrix.com> wrote in message
> news:OaQwBm0eFHA.596@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > We're using TCP for our connection, not named pipes.
> >
> > Also, I should explain why we're trying to avoid using WINS. Everything
I
> > read says that WINS is for backward compatibility. This is a new
server,
> so
> > we're trying to go in "clean" so we don't have to worry about divorcing
it
> > from WINS someday.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Pat
> >
> > "Terry" <ttrapp.spam.me.not@org.insurors.r3m0v3m3> wrote in message
> > news:7f3e9$42c0467d$45264c04$14491@NEWSOUTH.NET...
> > > Do you have the netbios protocol installed on the SQL server? IIRC it
is
> > > required when using named pipes as a connection method.
> > >
> > > --Terry
> > >
> > > "Patrick Peters" <patrick.peters@orametrix.com> wrote in message
> > > news:%23jAd6C0eFHA.1328@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > > > We have a mysterious problem connecting to a SQL database with ODBC.
> > > Here's
> > > > a little background on our environment:
> > > > - We're connecting to a named instance of SQL 2000 on a Win 2003
> Server
> > > > cluter. The virtual server name and the instance name are the same
> (so
> > > the
> > > > nomenclature to describe the instance would be something like
> > "FRED\FRED".
> > > > - The client is Windows XP, SP1.
> > > > - We're trying to set all this up without using WINS, so there are
no
> > WINS
> > > > resolutions for for the server cluster or any of its virtual
servers.
> > > >
> > > > So, we try to set up a System DSN with a connect string that looks
> like
> > > > "FRED.TEST.DOM\FRED" and ODBC can't connect. I can use nslookup to
> > > resolve
> > > > FRED.TEST.DOM without a problem. I can ping FRED.TEST.DOM. I can
> > > > substitute FRED's IP address in the server name field
> > ("10.20.30.40\FRED")
> > > > and it works like a charm.
> > > >
> > > > I've set up a sniffer to see what's going on. When I specify
> > > > "FRED.TEST.DOM\FRED" the client is trying its best to resolve FRED
> using
> > > > WINS, broadcasting for name resolution, etc. It's completely
ignoring
> > the
> > > > fact that I gave it a fully qualified domain name to work with. If
I
> > > could
> > > > just beat ODBC into doing DNS resolution, I'd be in great shape.
> > > >
> > > > I've looked around for examples of how to connect to a named
instance
> > > using
> > > > a DNS name, but I can't find an example of this anywhere.
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone have an idea?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Pat
> > > > patrick.peters (AT) orametrix.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>