You are right...
"Kalen Delaney" wrote:
> Hi RBC
>
> No, this is not hierarchical. You are not reading the syntax correctly.
>
> Please see
> ms-help://MS.SQLCC.v9/MS.SQLSVR.v9.en/tsqlref9/html/35fbcf7f-8b55-46cd-a957-9b8c7b311241.htm
> in the SQL Server 2005 Books Online which explains how to read the syntax
> specifications.
>
> In particular:
> | (vertical bar)
> Separates syntax items within brackets or braces. You can choose only
> one of the items.
>
>
> [ ] (brackets)
> Optional syntax items. Do not type the brackets.
>
>
>
> The syntax you show has a vertical bar inside brackets. That means you
> choose either what is before the bar or what is after.
> The table name is the only element requirement.
>
> Before the table name you can optionally have EITHER a databasename and an
> optional schema name OR a schema name.
>
> --
> HTH
> Kalen Delaney, SQL Server MVP
>
>
> "RBC" <RBC@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:848C392A-6DF4-41B5-A1EB-249945C2EEF5@microsoft.com...
> > The schema is hierachical according to the syntax. Do you claim the syntax
> > is
> > wrong?
> >
> > Syntax
> >
> > CREATE TABLE
> > [ database_name . [ schema_name ] . | schema_name . ] table_name
> >
> >
> > "Tibor Karaszi" wrote:
> >
> >> The schema concept is not hierarchical. An object is contained in a
> >> schema, not a level of schemas.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
> >>
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp > >>
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/ > >>
> >>
> >> "RBC" <RBC@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:DD3B310F-B41C-45E5-AEC9-C5F2DD1A12C4@microsoft.com...
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I try to create 2 schema as the syntax display's as below, but I get a
> >> > error
> >> > of only use 1. Do I have to change any parameters in SQL 2005?
> >> > And will I get any other problems in the future to use 2 schema?
> >> >
> >> > Syntax
> >> >
> >> > CREATE TABLE
> >> > [ database_name . [ schema_name ] . | schema_name . ] table_name
> >>
> >>
>
>