My problem is that I would like to have a log based
replication. Merge replication introduces Merge triggers
on the publisher which slows things down. I would also
like the merge agent to poll "faster" than the default 60
seconds. But that means increased load on the publisher
aswell, maybe not that much but still som extra load.
So far I don't see any problems with the snapshot
performance and I don't use any filters.
/Peter
[quoted text, click to view] >-----Original Message-----
>Transactional replication with updating subscribers and
>merge replication are the standard methods. While the
>former is optimised only for a small number of updates
on
>the subscriber this is not true of merge replication.
You
>mention merge replication performance problems on the
>publisher - please could you mention the issues you have
>seen in more detail. Also, you may be interested in
these
>merge optimisation techniques :
>
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/mai nt
>ain/mergperf.mspx
>HTH,
>Paul Ibison
>
>.
Peter,
if the merge triggers are having a noticeable effect on the publisher's
performance, and the merge topology is optimized, and you need shorter
polling times, then I'd consider optimizing the hardware.
Regards,
Paul Ibison