"Jane" <jane201315@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d7f9b5c5.0407121308.2f5c4d9@posting.google.com...
> Hi,
>
> I would very much appreciate any help regarding this problem. In short
> again, when there are no conflict resolvers, an update of the same row
> in the publisher and subscriber creates an entry in the conflict
> table. But, when I use say datetime (Later wins) conflict resolver, no
> such entry is found in the conflict table. Is there a way, one could
> use the resolvers and at the same time have the conflict listings in
> the table for the record?
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Jane.
>
>
> jane201315@yahoo.com (Jane) wrote in message
news:<d7f9b5c5.0407071216.29d074d3@posting.google.com>...
> > Hi Hilary,
> > I am using a push subscription. So, the conflict tables should be
> > populated on the publisher. They do get populated when I do not use
> > the default resolvers. But when I do use the resolvers, and say change
> > the same value in a row on the publisher and the subscriber, the
> > conflict is not recorded but is resolved as per the default resolver,
> > in my case the datetime(later wins) resolver.
> > Any idea why it does not record this in the conflict tables?
> > I appreciate your help!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jane.
> >
> > "Hilary Cotter" <hilaryk@att.net> wrote in message
news:<#9aZk6CZEHA.1448@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>...
> > > the conflict tables on the Publisher or Subscriber (depending what
kind of
> > > replication you are doing) should contain a record of any conflicts.
> > >
> > > When you use the Conflict Viewer these conflicts should show up there,
but
> > > sometimes don't. Check the underlying conflict tables for this article
and
> > > see if the records are there.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Hilary Cotter
> > > Looking for a book on SQL Server replication?
> > > http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
> > >
> > >
> > > "Jane" <jane201315@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:d7f9b5c5.0407070555.70f8136e@posting.google.com...
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I am using the default conflict resolver given by sql server 2000
> > > > (datetime(later wins)) for resolving conflicts in merge replication.
> > > > For all the conflicts resolved by this resolver, there is no record
of
> > > > the conflicts in the conflict table. Is there a way one could keep
the
> > > > records when say the same row was changed at two places though the
> > > > conflict resolver resolves the conflicts based on the latest update?
> > > >
> > > > Any suggestions/help is greatly appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jane.

"Hilary Cotter" <hilaryk@att.net> wrote in message news:<#xRwAXOaEHA.2408@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>...
> do you have a datetime column in this table? You must have one for this to
> work.
> "Jane" <jane201315@yahoo.com> wrote in message