lacs is primarily an indian unit of measurment. 1 lac is 0.1 million
"Hilary Cotter" wrote:
> What's a lacs?
>
> Basically there is probably no good solution for this. I would look at doing
> a sync. Then creating my publication and then backing it up and restoring it
> to all the subscribers and doing a no sync subscription, or I would look at
> regenerating a snapshot and distributing it after you have made the column
> change.
>
> --
> Hilary Cotter
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
>
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html >
> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
>
http://www.indexserverfaq.com >
> "SouRa" <SouRa@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:A19172BF-E8AC-4BB7-9FED-87EEC5353D89@microsoft.com...
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have about 50 databases (SQL Server 2000, SP3) which are merge
> > replicated. We merge replicate about 100 odd tables in each of these
> > database. We need to add couple of columns in one of our major transaction
> > table where most insert/updates are being done. This table presently on
> > average has 5 lacs records.
> >
> > During testing, we noticed that it takes about 60-80 minutes to add a
> > column in this table. Considering the # of database we have where the
> > change
> > need to implemented, we will not be able to plan the upgrade without
> > production downtime. For upgrade 50 database it will take about 50 hours.
> >
> > What are the options available in Replication so this can be done quickly
> > w/o any production downtime.
> >
> > Adding to this, in one of the column we have added to the transaction
> > table
> > , we need to update a new value. On testing we found that for 5 lacs
> > records
> > it takes anyway between 2-3 hours. This takes roughly another 75 hours for
> > us to do this update after adding the new column in the table. How can
> > this
> > be speeded up ?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Soura
>
>