Like Hillary states, some refer this process as cascading from A to B, from
B to C. Works well as long as the transactions are all going in one
direction. With Regards to unique ids, you are probably refering to PKs.
"Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cotter@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:uPWgfQCDGHA.1816@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> What you are trying to do is called republishing. Set up Box2 to be a
> publisher to Box3. Set up Box1 to replicate to Box2. Make sure when you
are
> creating your articles you select the snapshot option, keep existing table
> unchanged.
>
> Regarding your problem with a lack of unique id's - I think you mean a
lack
> of Primary Keys. Examine the data to see if you can't put primary keys on
> these tables - they are updating and deleting rows on these tables
according
> to some criteria used to uniquely identify them - if you can figure out
what
> this criteria is - make this your pk.
>
> --
> Hilary Cotter
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
>
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html >
> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
>
http://www.indexserverfaq.com >
> "Rob" <Rob@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:C247C730-10DF-4ED1-8C2E-CA26AA593066@microsoft.com...
> >I have an application with a sql backend. My company has an external
> > database on the webbox and an internal database for inter-company use.
I
> > was given the job of replicating this database between external and
> > internal.
> > I have 3 sql servers; BOX1 is external box that is used to run web
> > frontend
> > and house the external backend of app, BOX2 is internal (conduit between
> > internal and external), BOX3 is another internal box that is used for
> > backend
> > db of the internal frontend (hope this makes sense). BOX2 can only be a
> > pull
> > subscription from BOX1 and somehow this has to repl to BOX3. This
> > application is a third party vendor app so I cannot modify the data
> > structure. I'm new to replication and I'm not sure what the best way
to
> > accomplish this task. I tried transactional but I ran into a snag with
15
> > of
> > the 120 tables that do not have unique id's. Any ideas or suggestions
> > would be great.
> >
> > Thanks in Advance,
> > rob
> >
>
>