It is too good to be true. Basically what you have to do is enable sync with
backup on your publication database.
Then ship your msdb, distribution, published database to the standby server.
What will happen is your log reader will only read from the log before it
dumps which increases the latency. Now when you failover, you rename the
standby server with the name of the primary and it should pick up where it
left off if you enable the continue on data consistency profile. You may
need to issue sp_repldone incase the log reader is ahead of the distribution
database on the standby. This is somewhat documented in SQL 2000 BOL.
There are more options in SQL 2005. For example with a remote distributor
and if you use the PublisherFailoverPartner.
--
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com [quoted text, click to view] "Himanshu" <Himanshu@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:16FD2787-A5C5-4492-8185-43BF85EB3380@microsoft.com...
>I am documenting our disaster recovery plans and I was wondering if anyone
> has any experience with failing over to a log shipping secondary in a
> replicated environment.
>
> If I log ship all user databases, and msdb, and distribution to a
> secondary
> server, all to an exact point in time (after disabling all agent jobs),
> will
> replication work on the secondary box? What will break?
>
> I'm thinking that as long as the CNAME is updated so the DNS servers point
> to the new box, and the SYSSERVERS table is updated with the new LOCAL
> server
> name, and the account that starts the SQL Server and owns all the
> replication
> jobs is the same domain account, all should be good.
>
> It just sounds too good to be true! :)