Thanks, Hilary.
We haven't seen one drop off since we made this change. It's a rather
Hilary Cotter wrote:
> Make sure your history retention is the same as your retention period
> otherwise your subscription will expire when the lesser of the history
> retention or publication retention is exceeded.
>
> --
> Hilary Cotter
> Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
> RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
>
> This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
> positions, strategies or opinions.
>
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
>
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html >
> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
>
http://www.indexserverfaq.com >
>
>
> "KenJ" <kenjohnson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1163198676.820694.304180@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> > Greetings.
> >
> > I have several machines that have two merge pull subscriptions for two
> > databases. One subscription is set to continuous, the other
> > subscription is set to pull every hour. The publications are set to
> > drop subscribers if they don't synchronize within 14 days.
> >
> > This has been in production for one week (we're well under the 14 day
> > threshold). The continuous subscription is working properly for
> > everybody. Today, after being off-line for a period of time, one of
> > the subscribers attempted to merge its hourly subscription, but the
> > publisher had dropped the subscription from the server and I ended up
> > with no subscription at the publisher and the following error on the
> > subscriber:
> >
> > "The subscription to publication 'Obfuscated' has expired or does not
> > exist. The step failed."
> >
> > We have provided a UI through which the user of the subscribing machine
> > can re-initialize the offending subscription so, we have a work-around.
> > Hopefully, we can find the cause.
> >
> > Does any thoughts on why the publication would drop the subscription?
> >
> > The only entry I can find in this group that seems to match this
> > straight up was in 1999 regarding a known issue SQL server 7 pre-SP1:
> >
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_thread/thread/1ffdc41526b24f82/e9b07619ecf86b2e?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > KenJ
> >