It isn't possible, because it was never on the feature set. I know of lots
of people who requested this capability for merge, but none that wanted it
for transactional. One of the main reasons is that you are using an
inherently disconnected synchronization mechanism which fits in with the way
merge is run in almost all implementations, but is not the way transactional
is run. If you need the fature added to the transactional engine, you would
have to make a feature request.
--
Mike
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com Disclaimer: This communication is an original work and represents my sole
views on the subject. It does not represent the views of any other person
or entity either by inference or direct reference.
[quoted text, click to view] "MC" <marko_culo#@#yahoo#.#com#> wrote in message
news:uA%23NijZJGHA.1032@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Yes, I realise that. Do you know why web (https) replication isnt possible
> for transacional? And what about initialization, did you try doing it over
> https?
>
> MC
>
> "Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cotter@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%235zZtWZJGHA.2900@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> Its possible with transactional replication - merge only. This feature is
>> only supported in SQL 2005.
>>
>> --
>> Hilary Cotter
>> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
>>
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html >>
>> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
>>
http://www.indexserverfaq.com >>
>> "MC" <marko_culo#@#yahoo#.#com#> wrote in message
>> news:uh2x3bXJGHA.208@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>> I'm not certain if synch over the https is possible for transactional
>>> replication? I did see the setup for merge, but there is no mention of
>>> transactional. Now, is it possible or not? If not, why not?
>>>
>>> Second, initialization (access to snapshot) over https? Possible or not?
>>>
>>>
>>> MC
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
