Well nevermind for now. Seems like it's finally leveling off today after I
redid the subscription last night. All day it's been getting smaller (now
down to 10 minutes and the others being in the seconds); where as before it
would just get bigger and bigger (up to days behind.)
I suspect that in addition to the firmware updates and reindexing some
corrupted indexes have helped. But I am just guessing.
--Kristy
[quoted text, click to view] "Kristy" <pleasereplyby@posting.com> wrote in message
news:eeniL84RGHA.1688@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> I am using transactional replication for a 100GB database that has 2
nosync
> subscribers. The pull subscriptions are segmented into like table groups.
> They all use a custom profile for the distribution agents that I tweaked
> over time to minimize latecy. In the last month I have noticed that 1 of
the
> subscriptions always has a higher latency in EM then the others. After
> looking into several things, we also found out that there was a
> hardware/firmware problem with Dell, so we ahve applied that patch and it
> has fixed a number of other problems in the DB, but still not the latency
> problem on this one subscription. Some of the other subscriptions have
much
> bigger tables and data changes, so I am at a loss of why this one is
causing
> me so many problems. I frequently will have to apply a snapshot of this
> subscription because it will get so far behind, and then will slwly build
> back up again until another snapshot is required.
>
> Can anyone help???
> Here are some of the current configs of the custom profile:
> BcpBatchsize: 100000
> CommitBatchSize: 1000
> CommitBatchThreshold: 5000
> PollingInterval:1
>
> Thanks,
> Kristy
>
>