| Groups | Blog | Home |
sql server replication : compensate_for_errors
Sorry for the battery of questions.
Are there any risks or complications from changing an article with compensate_for_errors = false? Does it force any reinitialization of subs? Does it grow the msmerge_contents/tomb tables much? I am guessing this will add some conflicts to manage. Is there a more elegant, t-sql way to check and remove conflicts ie not one at a time. Will the conflicts keep clearing out automatically with a new snapshot generation? SQL2K sp4 , merge pubs/dist with 50 msde sp4 anon pull subs. Thanks in advance !! -- Mike
Thanks for the quick reply. Any ideas on the other questions?
-- Mike If data falls in the woods and nobody is there to see it ....... ? [quoted text, click to view] "Hilary Cotter" wrote:
> This controls what happens when there is a conflict. With compensate for > errors =true (default for SQL 2000), a conflict loser will have their data > replaced by teh conflict winner. With it false the conflict will merely be > logged, but the winning data will not replace the loosing data. > > -- > Hilary Cotter > Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy > RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. > > This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's > positions, strategies or opinions. > > Looking for a SQL Server replication book? > http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html > > Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS > http://www.indexserverfaq.com > > > > "Tigermikefl" <Tigermikefl@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:9C16C143-962A-4856-92BF-F68D49884682@microsoft.com... > > Sorry for the battery of questions. > > > > Are there any risks or complications from changing an article with > > compensate_for_errors = false? > > > > Does it force any reinitialization of subs? > > > > Does it grow the msmerge_contents/tomb tables much? > > > > I am guessing this will add some conflicts to manage. Is there a more > > elegant, t-sql way to check and remove conflicts ie not one at a time. > > > > Will the conflicts keep clearing out automatically with a new snapshot > > generation? > > > > SQL2K sp4 , merge pubs/dist with 50 msde sp4 anon pull subs. > > > > > > Thanks in advance !! > > > > -- > > Mike > > > > If data falls in the woods and nobody is there to see it ....... ? > >
This controls what happens when there is a conflict. With compensate for
errors =true (default for SQL 2000), a conflict loser will have their data replaced by teh conflict winner. With it false the conflict will merely be logged, but the winning data will not replace the loosing data. -- Hilary Cotter Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's positions, strategies or opinions. Looking for a SQL Server replication book? http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS http://www.indexserverfaq.com [quoted text, click to view] "Tigermikefl" <Tigermikefl@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:9C16C143-962A-4856-92BF-F68D49884682@microsoft.com... > Sorry for the battery of questions. > > Are there any risks or complications from changing an article with > compensate_for_errors = false? > > Does it force any reinitialization of subs? > > Does it grow the msmerge_contents/tomb tables much? > > I am guessing this will add some conflicts to manage. Is there a more > elegant, t-sql way to check and remove conflicts ie not one at a time. > > Will the conflicts keep clearing out automatically with a new snapshot > generation? > > SQL2K sp4 , merge pubs/dist with 50 msde sp4 anon pull subs. > > > Thanks in advance !! > > -- > Mike > > If data falls in the woods and nobody is there to see it ....... ?
Does it force any reinitialization of subs?
Yes [quoted text, click to view] > > > > Does it grow the msmerge_contents/tomb tables much? > > No impact [quoted text, click to view] > > I am guessing this will add some conflicts to manage. Is there a more > > elegant, t-sql way to check and remove conflicts ie not one at a time. > > No, it won't increase or decrease them. Use the conflicts viewer to manage them. [quoted text, click to view] > > Will the conflicts keep clearing out automatically with a new snapshot > > generation? Yes. -- Hilary Cotter Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's positions, strategies or opinions. Looking for a SQL Server replication book? http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS http://www.indexserverfaq.com [quoted text, click to view] "Tigermikefl" <Tigermikefl@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:78192610-762A-48B0-A514-40F144C3C7B3@microsoft.com... > Thanks for the quick reply. Any ideas on the other questions? > > > -- > Mike > > If data falls in the woods and nobody is there to see it ....... ? > > > "Hilary Cotter" wrote: > >> This controls what happens when there is a conflict. With compensate for >> errors =true (default for SQL 2000), a conflict loser will have their >> data >> replaced by teh conflict winner. With it false the conflict will merely >> be >> logged, but the winning data will not replace the loosing data. >> >> -- >> Hilary Cotter >> Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy >> RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. >> >> This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's >> positions, strategies or opinions. >> >> Looking for a SQL Server replication book? >> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html >> >> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS >> http://www.indexserverfaq.com >> >> >> >> "Tigermikefl" <Tigermikefl@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:9C16C143-962A-4856-92BF-F68D49884682@microsoft.com... >> > Sorry for the battery of questions. >> > >> > Are there any risks or complications from changing an article with >> > compensate_for_errors = false? >> > >> > Does it force any reinitialization of subs? >> > >> > Does it grow the msmerge_contents/tomb tables much? >> > >> > I am guessing this will add some conflicts to manage. Is there a more >> > elegant, t-sql way to check and remove conflicts ie not one at a time. >> > >> > Will the conflicts keep clearing out automatically with a new snapshot >> > generation? >> > >> > SQL2K sp4 , merge pubs/dist with 50 msde sp4 anon pull subs. >> > >> > >> > Thanks in advance !! >> > >> > -- >> > Mike >> > >> > If data falls in the woods and nobody is there to see it ....... ? >> >> >>
Excellent Hilary, thanks for the help.
-- Mike If data falls in the woods and nobody is there to see it ....... ? [quoted text, click to view] "Hilary Cotter" wrote:
> Does it force any reinitialization of subs? > > Yes > > > > > > > Does it grow the msmerge_contents/tomb tables much? > > > > > No impact > > > > I am guessing this will add some conflicts to manage. Is there a more > > > elegant, t-sql way to check and remove conflicts ie not one at a time. > > > > > No, it won't increase or decrease them. Use the conflicts viewer to manage > them. > > > > Will the conflicts keep clearing out automatically with a new snapshot > > > generation? > > Yes. > > -- > Hilary Cotter > Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy > RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. > > This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's > positions, strategies or opinions. > > Looking for a SQL Server replication book? > http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html > > Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS > http://www.indexserverfaq.com > > > > "Tigermikefl" <Tigermikefl@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:78192610-762A-48B0-A514-40F144C3C7B3@microsoft.com... > > Thanks for the quick reply. Any ideas on the other questions? > > > > > > -- > > Mike > > > > If data falls in the woods and nobody is there to see it ....... ? > > > > > > "Hilary Cotter" wrote: > > > >> This controls what happens when there is a conflict. With compensate for > >> errors =true (default for SQL 2000), a conflict loser will have their > >> data > >> replaced by teh conflict winner. With it false the conflict will merely > >> be > >> logged, but the winning data will not replace the loosing data. > >> > >> -- > >> Hilary Cotter > >> Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy > >> RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. > >> > >> This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's > >> positions, strategies or opinions. > >> > >> Looking for a SQL Server replication book? > >> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html > >> > >> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS > >> http://www.indexserverfaq.com > >> > >> > >> > >> "Tigermikefl" <Tigermikefl@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> news:9C16C143-962A-4856-92BF-F68D49884682@microsoft.com... > >> > Sorry for the battery of questions. > >> > > >> > Are there any risks or complications from changing an article with > >> > compensate_for_errors = false? > >> > > >> > Does it force any reinitialization of subs? > >> > > >> > Does it grow the msmerge_contents/tomb tables much? > >> > > >> > I am guessing this will add some conflicts to manage. Is there a more > >> > elegant, t-sql way to check and remove conflicts ie not one at a time. > >> > > >> > Will the conflicts keep clearing out automatically with a new snapshot > >> > generation? > >> > > >> > SQL2K sp4 , merge pubs/dist with 50 msde sp4 anon pull subs. > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks in advance !! > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Mike > >> > > >> > If data falls in the woods and nobody is there to see it ....... ? > >> > >> > >> > >
Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.
|
April 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
October 2008
| home · blog · groups | Questions? Comments? Contact the dn |