Let me see if I understand you:
Your company policy makers are asking
you to replicate an SQL server database
to another location, but they want you
to do this without using a direct connection!
Your company must have incredibly valuable data
(like Bank of America), *or* your company
policy makers do not understand how to
develop and implement a security policy for
this type of thing. You must convince them
that it is possible to achieve this, with very
little chance of a security breach, and then
show them how. You may need an outside
consultant to help you if you do not have
the skills in house.
If you can not convince them, then you
need to start looking for a new job, as
no one can build these kinds of solutions
without a *road* between the servers.
Russell Mangel
[quoted text, click to view] "Eugene" <spamthis@devdex.com> wrote in message
news:eTgmmAZwGHA.4612@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Please forgive me for being a little green on replication, I have not
> used MSSQL's (2000) replication capabilities yet but I'm trying solve a
> particular problem and I'm wondering if SQL Server's built-in
> replication will solve it.
>
> We have a database (SQL Server 2000) at location 1 within a corporate
> firewall. We'd like to replicate this database to a SQL Server at
> location 2 which is inside a separate firewall at a remote location. Due
> to corporate policies there is no way for one server to directly access
> the other, so a direct push or pull is not possible. The best solution
> that has been proposed so far would be to use an external FTP server
> that both locations can access. Given this:
>
> (1) Is it possible to use this external FTP server as a snapshot
> location? In the documentation I could only find setup instructions for
> Snapshot locations using FTP on the Publisher itself, not on a remote
> machine. If so, how?
> (2) If we can use the external FTP server, can we do merge replication,
> or are we limited to snapshot replication?
>
> The database at location 2 *could* simply be a snapshot of the database
> at location 1, but ideally we'd like to allow data to be updated and
> merged back to location 1 if it is a straightforward process.
>
> Thank you in advance for any advice you can offer - this forum is great!
>
> *** Sent via Developersdex
http://www.developersdex.com ***