|
|
You're in the
sql server replication
group:familiar request?
sql server replication:
Databases A and B are currently identical. When edits happen to B (which will be rare), I would like users to be able to visit a web page, press a button which synchronizes A to the changes on B. Can anyone advise on how to achieve this? Would it be necessary to set up some kind of replication job or would a query in a stored proc be able to do it without replication? Thanks SOC.
Does the data in A change at all? If A is read only, apart from the changes
originating from B, then I'd recommend Transactional Replication. Cheers, Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
Why do you need manual intervention? You could set up replication as an on
demand job, and pull or push using an ActiveX control for this. -- Hilary Cotter Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's positions, strategies or opinions. Looking for a SQL Server replication book? http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS http://www.indexserverfaq.com [quoted text, click to view] "soc" <zxc0@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:eeQNaYrwGHA.3964@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Hello, > > Databases A and B are currently identical. > > When edits happen to B (which will be rare), I would like users to be able > to visit a web page, > press a button which synchronizes A to the changes on B. > > Can anyone advise on how to achieve this? Would it be necessary to set up > some kind of replication job or > would a query in a stored proc be able to do it without replication? > > Thanks SOC. > > > > > >
OK, when you say checked do you mean you verify the change and then edit it
or submit it for synchronization? I take it only a few rows will be modified at any one time otherwise you will quickly be overwhelmed authorizing changes. Replication would work for this, but I think you need something different as replication is not designed for this type of transaction level control. -- Hilary Cotter Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's positions, strategies or opinions. Looking for a SQL Server replication book? http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS http://www.indexserverfaq.com [quoted text, click to view] "soc" <zxc0@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:OniyGRtwGHA.324@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > The databases are the backend of a web site (live and development) . Any > edits need to be checked then > synchronized. > > > > > > "Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cotter@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:uA1dHhswGHA.1272@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> Why do you need manual intervention? You could set up replication as an >> on demand job, and pull or push using an ActiveX control for this. >> >> -- >> Hilary Cotter >> Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy >> RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. >> >> This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's >> positions, strategies or opinions. >> >> Looking for a SQL Server replication book? >> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html >> >> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS >> http://www.indexserverfaq.com >> >> >> >> "soc" <zxc0@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:eeQNaYrwGHA.3964@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>> Hello, >>> >>> Databases A and B are currently identical. >>> >>> When edits happen to B (which will be rare), I would like users to be >>> able to visit a web page, >>> press a button which synchronizes A to the changes on B. >>> >>> Can anyone advise on how to achieve this? Would it be necessary to set >>> up some kind of replication job or >>> would a query in a stored proc be able to do it without replication? >>> >>> Thanks SOC. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Thanks, Yes A is read only.
Are replication techniques either continuous or scheduled? If so, neither of these suit my need. I want it to happen manually, once the changes have been verified by a user. [quoted text, click to view] "Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@Pygmalion.Com> wrote in message news:eeo8blrwGHA.5044@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Does the data in A change at all? If A is read only, apart from the > changes originating from B, then I'd recommend Transactional Replication. > Cheers, > Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com >
The databases are the backend of a web site (live and development) . Any
edits need to be checked then synchronized. [quoted text, click to view] "Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cotter@gmail.com> wrote in message news:uA1dHhswGHA.1272@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Why do you need manual intervention? You could set up replication as an > on demand job, and pull or push using an ActiveX control for this. > > -- > Hilary Cotter > Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy > RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. > > This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's > positions, strategies or opinions. > > Looking for a SQL Server replication book? > http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html > > Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS > http://www.indexserverfaq.com > > > > "soc" <zxc0@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:eeQNaYrwGHA.3964@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> Hello, >> >> Databases A and B are currently identical. >> >> When edits happen to B (which will be rare), I would like users to be >> able to visit a web page, >> press a button which synchronizes A to the changes on B. >> >> Can anyone advise on how to achieve this? Would it be necessary to set up >> some kind of replication job or >> would a query in a stored proc be able to do it without replication? >> >> Thanks SOC. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
Please see Hilary's reply for possible options.
Cheers, Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
Yes, the change can be viewed on a test version of the web site. If there
are no mistakes in the edited content, I would like to synchronise to the production database. Changes will happen rarely... maybe a handful of records per month. [quoted text, click to view] "Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cotter@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ebb56htwGHA.1288@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > OK, when you say checked do you mean you verify the change and then edit > it or submit it for synchronization? I take it only a few rows will be > modified at any one time otherwise you will quickly be overwhelmed > authorizing changes. Replication would work for this, but I think you need > something different as replication is not designed for this type of > transaction level control. > > -- > Hilary Cotter > Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy > RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. > > This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's > positions, strategies or opinions. > > Looking for a SQL Server replication book? > http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html > > Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS > http://www.indexserverfaq.com > > > > "soc" <zxc0@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:OniyGRtwGHA.324@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> The databases are the backend of a web site (live and development) . Any >> edits need to be checked then >> synchronized. >> >> >> >> >> >> "Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cotter@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:uA1dHhswGHA.1272@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>> Why do you need manual intervention? You could set up replication as an >>> on demand job, and pull or push using an ActiveX control for this. >>> >>> -- >>> Hilary Cotter >>> Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy >>> RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence. >>> >>> This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's >>> positions, strategies or opinions. >>> >>> Looking for a SQL Server replication book? >>> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html >>> >>> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS >>> http://www.indexserverfaq.com >>> >>> >>> >>> "soc" <zxc0@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:eeQNaYrwGHA.3964@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Databases A and B are currently identical. >>>> >>>> When edits happen to B (which will be rare), I would like users to be >>>> able to visit a web page, >>>> press a button which synchronizes A to the changes on B. >>>> >>>> Can anyone advise on how to achieve this? Would it be necessary to set >>>> up some kind of replication job or >>>> would a query in a stored proc be able to do it without replication? >>>> >>>> Thanks SOC. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.
|
April 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
| home · blog · groups | Questions? Comments? Contact the dn |