all groups > sql server replication > january 2007 >
You're in the

sql server replication

group:

Transaction replication identity propery question


Transaction replication identity propery question JN
1/25/2007 12:03:20 AM
sql server replication:
Hi all,

What are some of the pros and cons of NOT transferring the identity column
to the subscriber when using transactional replication?

I am wondering if it is worth the trouble to fix this issue?

Also, if I change can the identity column to "Yes (not for replication)"
will this solve the problem?

Thank you.
JN

Re: Transaction replication identity propery question Paul Ibison
1/25/2007 7:28:40 AM
Generally you don't want the NFR property on the subscriber in plain
transactional replication. After all, what would be its purpose as the
subscriber is to be treated as RO. For updatable subscribers of all forms,
you'll want this (NFR) to be set.
Cheers,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com .

Re: Transaction replication identity propery question JN
1/25/2007 10:05:38 AM
Just to clarify, I should set the Identity columns to NFR on the
publications?


[quoted text, click to view]

Re: Transaction replication identity propery question Paul Ibison
1/25/2007 4:34:24 PM
What type are your publications? Are the subscribers updatable in any form?
If so, use the NFR and set automatic identity range management. Otherwise
(other publication types) it doesn't matter.
Cheers,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com .




AddThis Social Bookmark Button