> Hi,
>
> We are using merge replication between four servers (1 publisher & 3
> subscribers). The same articles (tables) are in each publication. I run
> the application which changes data in some tables and adds records in
> another table. The inserted data is immediately updated via trigger.
> After running the application all expected data is present. If I manually
> force replication to each subscriber sequentially, all expected data is
> present. If I run replication between the servers at the same time, the
> table to which data was added will lose some data. The data lost was not
> the data that was just added. We are running SQL Server 2000 SP3a on all
> servers. Any ideas?
>
> tia,
> Paul
>

"Grigoris Tsolakidis" <gcholakidis@spam_remove.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uhRQsHGmHHA.4852@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Look at the 'view conflict' at replication monitor...
> Ï "PaulW" <MSNewsGroup@Digi-Sol.com> Ýãñáøå óôï ìÞíõìá
> news:urv9zNxlHHA.1216@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are using merge replication between four servers (1 publisher & 3
>> subscribers). The same articles (tables) are in each publication. I run
>> the application which changes data in some tables and adds records in
>> another table. The inserted data is immediately updated via trigger.
>> After running the application all expected data is present. If I manually
>> force replication to each subscriber sequentially, all expected data is
>> present. If I run replication between the servers at the same time, the
>> table to which data was added will lose some data. The data lost was not
>> the data that was just added. We are running SQL Server 2000 SP3a on all
>> servers. Any ideas?
>>
>> tia,
>> Paul
>>
>
>