all groups > sql server reporting services > november 2004 >
You're in the

sql server reporting services

group:

Report Server and Report Manager on different machines


Report Server and Report Manager on different machines Justin
11/16/2004 1:41:03 PM
sql server reporting services:
It is possible to configure a system of servers such that
the Report Manager can be running on a separate machine
than the Report Server?

We are concerned about the security issues of exposing a
server with the Front Page Server Extensions installed on
it, because it will reside outside of our corporate
firewall. As an alternative, we are hoping we can host
the Web Server/IIS box outside the firewall, and have
this machine run the Report Manager, while another box
inside the firewall runs the Report Server (which,
incidentally, will also be a separate box than the data
server).

Whether the security concerns of FPSE are real or
perceived, our clients might not like them. So, is the
type of configuration described above at all possible?
If not, please explain why. If it is possible, please
explain how.

Thanks in advance!
Re: Report Server and Report Manager on different machines anonymous NO[at]SPAM discussions.microsoft.com
11/16/2004 3:56:02 PM
So, FPSE are only required on a Report Designer
installtion -- is that correct?

FPSE are a requirement for VisualStudio.NET installation,
which are required for Report Designer, right?


[quoted text, click to view]
Re: Report Server and Report Manager on different machines Bruce L-C [MVP]
11/16/2004 5:01:31 PM
Front Page Server extensions are not necessary for Report Manager. Just to
make sure I checked one of my servers (Windows 2003) and the default website
which has Report Manager does not have FP server extension.

--
Bruce Loehle-Conger
MVP SQL Server Reporting Services

[quoted text, click to view]

Re: Report Server and Report Manager on different machines Justin
11/17/2004 8:30:08 AM
Yes, I guess I do have that misconception. I thought
that in order to deploy a report from the report designer
to the report server, FPSE were required.

I'm glad to hear that this is not the case. I'll check
out our servers again and try to verify this.

Thanks.

[quoted text, click to view]
Re: Report Server and Report Manager on different machines Justin
11/17/2004 8:41:17 AM
Yes, that makes sense. I think that is exactly where I
was going wrong.

Thanks again!


[quoted text, click to view]
Re: Report Server and Report Manager on different machines Bruce L-C [MVP]
11/17/2004 9:16:39 AM
No. FPSE are not required for anything. The report designer does not even
have to have IIS.

You've gotten a misconception from somewhere that this is required.

--
Bruce Loehle-Conger
MVP SQL Server Reporting Services

[quoted text, click to view]

Re: Report Server and Report Manager on different machines Bruce L-C [MVP]
11/17/2004 10:37:18 AM
What you might be confused about is thinking about using Visual Studio for
regular ASP.Net development. It is common to have FPSE for that. However,
with RS you are not deploying webpages. What you are doing is using
webservices to deploy the RDL. If you look on the server you will see that
no files are even showing up there when you deploy. That is because the RDL
is being stored in the database, not in the file system.

--
Bruce Loehle-Conger
MVP SQL Server Reporting Services

[quoted text, click to view]

AddThis Social Bookmark Button