|
|
You're in the
sql server reporting services
group:How robust is Reporting Services 2005
sql server reporting services:
There will, I suspect, be few changes between Sept CTP of RS2005 and the RTM version. Sept CTP is certainly robust enough to develop on and previous versions have been for quite some time. Sept CTP of RS2005 is compatible with VS2005 RC. Install Sept CTP first, then VS2005. Andrew Watt MVP - InfoPath On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:01:05 -0400, "A.M-SG" [quoted text, click to view] <alanalan@newsgroup.nospam> wrote:
>Hi, > > > >I am thinking to suggest Reporting Services 2005 to our client to build >several complex/mission critical reports. > > > >The only point that is not clear for me is that how robust is the current >beta version of SSRS 2005? > > > >Can we start report development on SSRS 2005 latest beta version and then >continue using the final release in November? > > > >Is the latest beta version of SSRS 2005 aligning with the Visual Studio 2005 >Release Candidate 1? > > > >I am asking because there are some report viewer user controls for visual >studio 2005 that is included in SSRS 2005. I am not sure those report viewer >user controls work in VS2005 release candidate 1. > > > >Any help, suggestion or advice would be appreciated, > >Alan > > >
Hi,
I am thinking to suggest Reporting Services 2005 to our client to build several complex/mission critical reports. The only point that is not clear for me is that how robust is the current beta version of SSRS 2005? Can we start report development on SSRS 2005 latest beta version and then continue using the final release in November? Is the latest beta version of SSRS 2005 aligning with the Visual Studio 2005 Release Candidate 1? I am asking because there are some report viewer user controls for visual studio 2005 that is included in SSRS 2005. I am not sure those report viewer user controls work in VS2005 release candidate 1. Any help, suggestion or advice would be appreciated, Alan
Hi Yanhong,
No problem. :) I am sure that we all want users to get maximum benefit from Reporting Services 2005. Andrew Watt MVP - InfoPath On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:29:03 GMT, yhhuang@online.microsoft.com [quoted text, click to view] (Yan-Hong Huang[MSFT]) wrote:
>Hello Andrew, > >Thanks very much for your reply and useful information provided. I agreed >much with you that most of features should be OK now and it is OK to >program in SQL 2005. Perhaps there will be some minor change between CTP >and RTM version. But Alan doesn't need to change much code after the final >version releases. Besides, you are right that all SQL reporting service >related issues can be posted here. > >For this particular post, Alan is a MSDN subscriber and posted his question >in MSDN managed newsgroup. Our team has commitment to reply him and work >with him on it. Or if it is beyond our newsgroup support boundary, we >should let Alan know as soon as possible so that he could find some other >proper channel if he feel it is necessary. That is why Sophie replied him >that. > >Surely all we have done is not stopping community from answering Alan. I >believe all the information is welcome here expecially experience sharing. >Please do continue to share your experience here and let's work together to >make it better and better. > >Thanks very much for your understanding. > >Have a good day. > >Best regards, >Yanhong Huang >Microsoft Community Support > >Get Secure! ¨C www.microsoft.com/security > >This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Sophie,
This newsgroup, as I understand it, is intended to cover all versions of Reporting Services. I have asked internally if there will be a separate Reporting Services 2005 newsgroup and was told that this newsgroup is the one where SQL Server 2000 and 2005 Reporting Services will be answered. I am happy to continue to help users and answer Reporting Services 2005 questions in this newsgroup. Of course, the fora provide an alternate place to ask questions. Andrew Watt MVP - InfoPath On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:02:13 GMT, v-sguo@online.microsoft.com (Sophie [quoted text, click to view] Guo [MSFT]) wrote:
>Hello, > >For questions of SQL server 2005, please access the following website and >then click "SQL Server 2005 Forums on MSDN": > >http://www.microsoft.com/technet/community/newsgroups/server/sql.mspx > >Thanks for cooperation. > >Sophie Guo >Microsoft Online Partner Support > >Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security > >===================================================== >When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so >that others may learn and benefit from your issue. >===================================================== >This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > >
Hello,
For questions of SQL server 2005, please access the following website and then click "SQL Server 2005 Forums on MSDN": http://www.microsoft.com/technet/community/newsgroups/server/sql.mspx Thanks for cooperation. Sophie Guo Microsoft Online Partner Support Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security ===================================================== When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so that others may learn and benefit from your issue. ===================================================== This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
I'm surprised there are no words of caution.
Looking at your time frame, there are only a few weeks until the final version is released, so there is a limited amount of work you'll be able to accomplish before you'll be looking to re-install. Installing the final release where you had beta versions running may not be a trivial task. I don't know how many machines you are dealing with, but you may want to limit the extent to which you install the CTP.
I'm surprised there are no words of caution.
Looking at your time frame, there are only a few weeks until the final version is released, so there is a limited amount of work you'll be able to accomplish before you'll be looking to re-install. Installing the final release where you had beta versions running may not be a trivial task. I don't know how many machines you are dealing with, but you may want to limit the extent to which you install the CTP.
Hello Andrew,
Thanks very much for your reply and useful information provided. I agreed much with you that most of features should be OK now and it is OK to program in SQL 2005. Perhaps there will be some minor change between CTP and RTM version. But Alan doesn't need to change much code after the final version releases. Besides, you are right that all SQL reporting service related issues can be posted here. For this particular post, Alan is a MSDN subscriber and posted his question in MSDN managed newsgroup. Our team has commitment to reply him and work with him on it. Or if it is beyond our newsgroup support boundary, we should let Alan know as soon as possible so that he could find some other proper channel if he feel it is necessary. That is why Sophie replied him that. Surely all we have done is not stopping community from answering Alan. I believe all the information is welcome here expecially experience sharing. Please do continue to share your experience here and let's work together to make it better and better. Thanks very much for your understanding. Have a good day. Best regards, Yanhong Huang Microsoft Community Support Get Secure! ¨C www.microsoft.com/security This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.
|
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
| home · blog · groups | Questions? Comments? Contact the dn |