"Chris McGuigan" wrote:

> I'm with you now!
> It's possible but it's a bit of a hack.
>
> Basically you need to squeeze two text boxes into the row header, you
> can do this with 'rectangle' controls.
>
> Create a rectangle OUTSIDE the data region, create two textboxes inside
> the rectangle, laid out the way you want them. Set their values to the
> appropriate fields.
> Cut and paste the rectangle into the row group cell on the matrix and
> Bingo! it should work.
>
> The downside to this method is it can be quite fiddly to get the
> formatting just right but you can do it.
>
> To try and explain it graphically, the structure of your matrix should
> be something like this.
>
>
> +--Matrix--------------+----------+
> | | |
> +----------------------+----------+
> |+==Rectangle=========+| |
> ||+--Textbox1--------+|| |
> ||| ||| |
> ||+------------------+|| |
> ||+--Textbox2--------+|| |
> ||| ||| |
> ||+------------------+|| |
> |+====================+| |
> +----------------------+----------+
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> CCP wrote:
>
> > Thanks chris for ur reply...
> > When i add a row like that..its repeating column wise i want it to
> > repeat row wise....
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > "Chris McGuigan" wrote:
> >
> > > Right click the data cell and do 'Add Row'.
> > > You are effectively creating two rows per record.
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > CCP wrote:
> > >
> > > > HI,
> > > > Is it possible to have row grouping for each row in a matrix??
> > > >
> > > > Something like
> > > >
> > > > header1 header2
> > > > Task1
> > > > Section1
> > > > Row1 value1 value1
> > > > Section2
> > > > Row2 value2 value2
> > > > Task2
> > > > Section1
> > > > Row1 value1 value1
> > > >
> > > > When i use a matrix grouping it is producing the result as
> > > > Task1 Section1 Row1 value1 value1
> > > > Section2 Row2 value2 value2
> > > > Task2 Section1 Row1 value1 value1
> > > >
> > > > What i need to get the similiar look and feel as the previous
> > > > one..... I could get this design with a table grouping but the
> > > > columns are populated dynamically... which is not possible in a
> > > > table so im shifting to a matrix....
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your help is highly appreciated...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > >
> > >
>