all groups > sql server reporting services > september 2005 >
You're in the

sql server reporting services

group:

RS - Planning Question


RS - Planning Question Jerry Spivey
9/13/2005 8:41:44 AM
sql server reporting services:
Hi,

We're looking to implement Reporting Services in our environment. We
currently have a couple of high-end SQL Server boxes with relatively low
usage. I'm considering installing Reporting Services on one of these SQL
Server boxes or installing Reporting Services on another box isolated to RS
that would point to one of these existing SQL Servers. All boxes are
dual-proc 3 GHz or higher with 2 GB-3GB RAM and ample HD space. Are there
any performance issues I should be aware of or possibly licensing issues
with installing RS on a seperate SQL Server?

Thanks

Jerry

Re: RS - Planning Question Jerry Spivey
9/13/2005 8:54:08 AM
Last sentence should be ...RS on a seperate server (not a SQL Server).

Thanks

Jerry
[quoted text, click to view]

Re: RS - Planning Question Jerry Spivey
9/13/2005 9:10:45 AM
Bruce,

Are you saying that if I install RS on a stand alone box (w/o SQL Server)
and point it to another SQL Server to store the ReportServer and
ReportServerTempDB databases that I'm required to have a SQL Server license
for the box running RS? Are you refering to a SQL Server cal license or a
per CPU license (costing thousands)?

Thanks

Jerry
[quoted text, click to view]

Re: RS - Planning Question Jerry Spivey
9/13/2005 9:38:59 AM
Thanks Bruce.

The "explanation" makes sense now.

Here are a couple of useful links I ran across for future reference on
subsequent reads of this thread:

RS Deployment Guide
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/deploy/rsdepgd.mspx#EEAA

RS Licensing FAQ
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/reporting/howtobuy/faq.mspx

How to License RS
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/reporting/howtobuy/howtolicensers.mspx

Jerry
[quoted text, click to view]

Re: RS - Planning Question Bruce L-C [MVP]
9/13/2005 11:00:18 AM
Every box that RS is on has to have a SQL Server license whether or not the
database resides on it or not.

If it is a low usage server I'd say give it a try. First off, it is a lot
cheaper. I currently have a datamart that I have done that with (both RS and
SQL Server on one server).


--
Bruce Loehle-Conger
MVP SQL Server Reporting Services

[quoted text, click to view]

Re: RS - Planning Question Bruce L-C [MVP]
9/13/2005 11:21:20 AM
As far as licensing is concerned installing RS on a server is the same as
installing the DB. I had it explained to me this way. You can buy MS Office
which has Word, Excel, Powerpoint etc. You can't install Word on one PC,
Excel on another and Powerpoint on a third without paying/licensing it.

SQL Server is not a suite of products: Database, Analysis Services,
Reporting Services. Same rule holds for RS as for Analysis Services. I.e.
you install on another machine you need a license.

What you need for it depends on your environment. If you are reporting over
the internet I believe you have to do per processor (just a guess). In an
intranet environment it depends on how you have licenses. In my case all PCs
in our compnay have a CAL to connect to any database we have. So I just buy
a server license and I have no additional CALS to buy. The easiest way to
think about this is your licensing is exactly the same as if you were adding
another database server.


--
Bruce Loehle-Conger
MVP SQL Server Reporting Services

[quoted text, click to view]

AddThis Social Bookmark Button