My impression that there are some things that is easy to do in Crystal that
is hard in RS and vice a versa (spelling?). RS is different with how you do
things. For instance, if you want to solve the problem the RS way then you
will do fine. If you want to do it the Crystal would do it and feel that RS
is stupid if it can't do it then stay with Crystal. As an example, Crystal
works a lot where you give it a recordest and away it goes. RS is designed
as a service. You set it up to do things and then envoke the service. If you
want to have all your own code returning datasets, etc then Crystal handles
this better. If you want to just set up the SQL statement or call a stored
procedure and let RS handle creating the dataset then you are good to go.
RS is particularly good at creating interactive reports, drill through is
very easy and powerful and fast.
--
Bruce Loehle-Conger
MVP SQL Server Reporting Services
[quoted text, click to view] "Smokey Grindel" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:eDzAFV6yGHA.4408@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> We use reports heavely and have LOTS of data to work with that needs
> reports run on, and right now we have a couple reports in crystal XI, but
> were looking at reporting services on SQL 2005 since we already have it...
> honest opinnions please, is it a good product? anything its lacking that
> crystal has, anything that it has that crystal doesnt? thanks a lot!
>