I added the computer in the domain to the security list that sharepoint
services is on and now the message changed to this "HTTP/1.1 404 Connection:
close Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:42:58 GMT Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET MicrosoftSharePointTeamServices: 12.0.0.4518 "
[quoted text, click to view] "Smokey Grindel" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:uuYkGzrWHHA.488@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>I really just do not understand this and it is really frustrating me... I
>made a custom authentication/authorization extension that uses forms
>authentication... it works fine on my local system (32bit windows xp pro
>sp2 with SQL 2005 Dev SP2)... So I installed it onto our development test
>server running SQL 2005 Dev edition SP2 (32bit windows server 2003) works
>great! figure ok its working! now I go to our master setup, which is like
>this
>
> Active/Passive failover cluster with shared storage on a SAN... 2 node
> cluster... both running windows server 2003 64bit! SQL Server is
> clustered, but we dont care much about reporting services being fail over
> because they fail so infrequently.. so I do all the same stuff I do to
> install it on the 32bit server... now this is what happends
>
>
> I open up http://sqlvirtualhost/Reports (sqlvirtualhost is the virtual
> cluster name we gave the sql server instance) it goes to the report server
> logon screen, I login, that works fine... I get a list of reports, ok
> great! seems to be working! I click on a report... boom problem... gives
> me a .net assembly name that has Microsoft.ReportingService.xxxxx in
> (xxxx changes sometimes usually Modeling or Design seems like?) anyways it
> says Access Denied is the error and thats it! I cant figure out what is
> denied access or what is causing it... this same thing with the same
> config works great on the two 32bit systems! the assembly is compiled for
> "AutoCPU" to let .NET framework auto compile it to 32 or 64bit on
> demand... im ripping out my hair here, can anyone help me or give me some
> direction on what to do or look for? THANKS A LOT!
>