"Todd Price" <ToddPrice@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3F88254E-C8D1-48A3-B97C-849CD922DF5E@microsoft.com...
> Does anyone have any recommendations on whether to use
> System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Cache or System.Web.HttpRuntime.Cache to
> access the ASP.NET Cache? Are these different cache contexts? If they
> are
> the same, is there a difference in performance between the two?

"Alvin Bruney [MVP]" <vapor at steaming post office> wrote in message
news:O$MWkSmBFHA.2392@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> No, they are basically the same underneath.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Alvin Bruney
>
> [Shameless Author plug]
> The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET
> Now Available @ www.lulu.com/owc
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> "Todd Price" <ToddPrice@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:3F88254E-C8D1-48A3-B97C-849CD922DF5E@microsoft.com...
> > Does anyone have any recommendations on whether to use
> > System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Cache or System.Web.HttpRuntime.Cache to
> > access the ASP.NET Cache? Are these different cache contexts? If they
> > are
> > the same, is there a difference in performance between the two?
>
>

"Ben Strackany" <infoNOSPAM@developmentnow.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:uHmBwPUDFHA.2756@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Alvin, that is truly a shamless author plug. Heh, no, just kidding. :)
>
> Todd, one thing to note is than a few places in the MSDN documentation, it
> erroneously implies that System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Cache is some sort
> of temporary, page-execution-only cache. That's not the case.
>
> --
> Ben Strackany
> www.developmentnow.com
>
>
> "Alvin Bruney [MVP]" <vapor at steaming post office> wrote in message
> news:O$MWkSmBFHA.2392@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> No, they are basically the same underneath.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Alvin Bruney
>>
>> [Shameless Author plug]
>> The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET
>> Now Available @ www.lulu.com/owc
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> "Todd Price" <ToddPrice@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:3F88254E-C8D1-48A3-B97C-849CD922DF5E@microsoft.com...
>> > Does anyone have any recommendations on whether to use
>> > System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Cache or System.Web.HttpRuntime.Cache to
>> > access the ASP.NET Cache? Are these different cache contexts? If they
>> > are
>> > the same, is there a difference in performance between the two?
>>
>>
>
>