"Simon Hart" <srhartone@(nospam)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:BB0510C3-B715-4C9D-B53F-4CDA379FAE67@microsoft.com...
> Hi,
>
> Pocket Access does suck bigtime, avoid. I find SQLCE2.0 performance good
> on
> CF1.0.
>
> Is SQL Mobile the next version of SQLCE?
>
> Regards
> Simon.
>
> "Ginny Caughey [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> nath,
>>
>> The biggest problem with Pocket Access is that it isn't available on
>> Windows
>> Mobile 5.0. The second biggest problem is speed. Both SqlCE and SQL
>> Mobile
>> are faster, and SQL Mobile is certainly the best choice if you are using
>> CF
>> 2.0. The biggest problem with the SQL products is that you can't use
>> Activesync to just sync them (although merge replication and RDA are
>> options
>> for syncing with SQL Server), so you'll need a 3rd party product like one
>> of
>> these:
>>
>> www.gui-innovations.com
>> www.primeworks.pt
>>
>> --
>> Ginny Caughey
>> ..NET Compact Framework MVP
>>
>>
>> "Nathan Franklin" <nathan@tsn.cc> wrote in message
>> news:dk5a5e$2d9$1@news-02.connect.com.au...
>> > hey guys, i think i have decided upon using pocket access.
>> >
>> > it is just for a simple app with simple sql queries ( nothing more then
>> > inner joins )
>> >
>> > my question is, how do i add the database into activesync so it sync
>> > with
>> > every sync operation..
>> >
>> > i need to know how to do it programatically, could someone please help
>> > me..
>> >
>> > also am I likeley to run into any problems using pocket access, it is
>> > for
>> > a relativly small app not exceed 65000 records...
>> >
>> > its a slow db isnt it? thats ok i guess, but i dont think i need to go
>> > to
>> > the trouble of installing sql server ce, and then msde on the desktop
>> > and
>> > also configuiring iis for replication.. etc.. etc.. blah blah
>> > especially
>> > when this all has to be automated!!
>> >
>> > thanks heaps dudes
>> >
>> > kind regards
>> > nath
>> >
>>
>>
>>