You are looking at a wrong dll. The dlls in the WindowsCE directory are
metadata stubs. Go into WCE400\Armv4 directory, explode a cab and look into
SY9B57~1.013 or copy the dll from a device where CF2 is installed
--
Alex Feinman
---
Visit
http://www.opennetcf.org [quoted text, click to view] "notu" <jpierce2@austin.rr.com> wrote in message
news:%23CegtwbfFHA.3940@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>I have been developing a custom control that extends the CF 1 data grid.
>Using reflection I have been able to add features like locked columns,
>value based row highlighting, column and row paging, in cell text editing,
>control based in cell editing, vertical detail view for the selected row,
>alternate row shading, selective column shading, selective column header
>shading, and other features.
>
>
>
> Now I am looking at creating a CF 2.0 version. However, if I use the Lutz
> Roeder's .NET Reflector tool to get the internal field and method names
> from the CF 2.0 DataGrid dll, I don't see any of the internal fields or
> methods that I'm using in the CF 1 DataGrid dll.
>
>
>
> I noticed that the new CF 2.0 DataGrid dll is only 12k compared to the CF
> 1 DataGrid that is 90k
>
>
>
> So what's up with the new DataGrid I thought it was better?
>
>
I have been developing a custom control that extends the CF 1 data grid.
Using reflection I have been able to add features like locked columns, value
based row highlighting, column and row paging, in cell text editing,
control based in cell editing, vertical detail view for the selected row,
alternate row shading, selective column shading, selective column header
shading, and other features.
Now I am looking at creating a CF 2.0 version. However, if I use the Lutz
Roeder's .NET Reflector tool to get the internal field and method names from
the CF 2.0 DataGrid dll, I don't see any of the internal fields or methods
that I'm using in the CF 1 DataGrid dll.
I noticed that the new CF 2.0 DataGrid dll is only 12k compared to the CF 1
DataGrid that is 90k
So what's up with the new DataGrid I thought it was better?