certificate. This means it will work on all Pocket PC Phone edition devices
and only some Smartphones. If your smartphone device is operator branded you
(InTheHand.WindowsMobile.Native.dll) from that operator. Its logistically
all Smartphone devices. In Windows Mobile 5.0 the situation is better since
the native support is built in.
The reported issues around Deleting items have been resolved.
the latest being v2.1. If you have any problems downloading the updates
"Jarod" <jarod_lavay@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162504603.958138.142180@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Mpoy,
>
> I would suggest you look for and talk with other people who have used
> or tried to use the InTheHand mail API. I've tried 2 different versions
> of the InTheHand library and found both of them to be full of bugs.
> Also check the InTheHand forums to see the problems people are having.
>
> Here's the most frustrating issues that my friends and I have run into
>
> - Deleting email from any folder (inbox, sent, etc) causes an
> uncatchable exception to be thrown and crashes our applications
>
> - Start my custom client that reads the inbox, then delete an email
> from the inbox manually using the Windows Mobile mail client, then
> rescan the inbox using my custom client and another uncatchable
> exception is thrown crashing my client
>
> - SMS interceptor does not work 90% on windows mobile smartphones
>
> - Disabling an SMS interceptor throws exceptions
>
> Now these issues may have been fixed since we last tried to use the
> library 3 months back but we've already paid for 2 different versions
> and have been disappointed both times.
>
> Please note that neither I nor my friends have anything against Peter
> Foot, we're sure he's a good guy and all. I'm NOT trying to start a
> flame war by posting this comment either. I just wanted to get our
> story out there for the record.
>
> There was at one time an alternative library called Mail Wrapper but it
> only worked on Windows Mobile 2003. But that seems to have disappeared
> from Handango. I know people using the Mail Wrapper library and they
> swear by it, they refuse to use anything else for accessing emails and
> sms messages.
>
> Jarod
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 2, 8:36 am, "Mpoy" <empw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Seriously, I want to thank you all for helping me. Even just for
>> replying here, I really just need some help right now... I'm really
>> looking now into using that InTheHand. I'll just try to convert and
>> make this last wrapper trial, I'm really burnt out with this wrappers
>> and conversions and stuff.... Thanks!
>>
>> Thanks again!
>> Mpoy
>>
>> Paul G. Tobey [eMVP] wrote:
>>
>> > I can think of absolutely no reason, other than a contractual
>> > obligation to
>> > be in control of the source for everything, that would cause me to want
>> > to
>> > know how to process SMS messages myself. I'd say that it's a complete
>> > waste
>> > of time, unless there's some reason why you'd want to be a low-level
>> > expert
>> > in how the phone stack works.
>>
>> > Paul T.
>>
>> > "Mpoy" <empw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >news:1162483546.489888.76500@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>> > > Actually, time is indeed valuable. I don't have anything against or
>> > > any
>> > > objections on InTheHand, indeed it is very impressive and superior at
>> > > all. I'm just looking at the possibility of doing it on my own, if
>> > > its
>> > > really possible. Also, the things that I will be needing from
>> > > InTheHand, such as reading sent sms and sent email messages, will
>> > > cost
>> > > me $$ somehow, so I'm still looking on the possibility of writing it
>> > > up
>> > > since it was already done by others.
>>
>> > > Do you think that its not worthiet to write the wrapper on my own?
>>
>> > > Thanks!
>> > > Mpoy
>>
>> > > Paul G. Tobey [eMVP] wrote:
>> > >> So, your time is of no value at all to you? What's your objection
>> > >> to
>> > >> InTheHand?
>>
>> > >> Paul T.
>>
>> > >> "Mpoy" <empw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > >>news:1162481612.458985.150440@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> > >> > Yeah, I guess i'll take that one. But I can hardly find a
>> > >> > reference in
>> > >> > the internet for such. That's why I'm having a hard time writing
>> > >> > that
>> > >> > wrapper. Can you point me to some references in the net?
>>
>> > >> > Thanks!
>> > >> > Mpoy
>>
>> > >> > <ctacke/> wrote:
>> > >> >> Write the wrapper yourself, just like the third party did.
>>
>> > >> >> --
>> > >> >> Chris Tacke
>> > >> >> OpenNETCF Consulting
>> > >> >> Managed Code in the Embedded World
>> > >> >>
www.opennetcf.com >> > >> >> --
>>
>> > >> >> "Mpoy" <empw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > >> >>news:1162453470.520277.47020@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>> > >> >> > Hi Peter,
>>
>> > >> >> > If I would disregard the possibility of using a ready made
>> > >> >> > wrapper,
>> > >> >> > like 'inthehand', what are other possibilities for me to use
>> > >> >> > CEMAPI?
>>
>> > >> >> > Thanks!
>> > >> >> > Mpoy
>>
>> > >> >> > Peter Foot [MVP] wrote:
>> > >> >> >> You need to use CEMAPI, which is COM based but doesn't
>> > >> >> >> correctly
>> > >> >> >> adhere
>> > >> >> >> to
>> > >> >> >> the rules of COM so you can't use it directly with COM Interop
>> > >> >> >> in
>> > >> >> >> .NETCF
>> > >> >> >> v2.0, or a ready-made wrapper :-
>> > >> >> >>
http://www.inthehand.com/WindowsMobile.aspx >>
>> > >> >> >> Peter
>>
>> > >> >> >> --
>> > >> >> >> Peter Foot
>> > >> >> >> Device Application Development MVP
>> > >> >> >>
www.peterfoot.net|
www.inthehand.com >>
>> > >> >> >> "Mpoy" <empw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > >> >> >>news:1162278500.066719.58560@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>> > >> >> >> > Is it possible to retrieve sent email messages using
>> > >> >> >> > opennetcf?
>> > >> >> >> > or
>> > >> >> >> > how
>> > >> >> >> > can I retrieve sent email messages?
>>
>> > >> >> >> > Thanks!
>