Thanks for that information, I hadn't really looked into the support option.
I did notice this line:
OpenNETCF.Windows.Forms.Signature
in the ...Smart Device Framework\unsupportedcontrols.txt file, so I thought
it was basically unsupported.
I'm not terribly worried about it because I think the signature control is
fine for our purposes, I had evaluated it before we went with the HoodCanal
control. My client chose the commercial product (incorrectly believing
support would be available because it was a commercial product.)
Thanks again
James
[quoted text, click to view] "<ctacke/>" <ctacke_AT_OpenNETCF_com> wrote in message
news:eoBpiOKPGHA.2696@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> We do offer paid support for the SDF.
>
> -Chris
>
>
> "Microsoft" <jglover@nospam.eastridge.net> wrote in message
> news:uUjaWzJPGHA.1696@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> Thanks for the feedback.
>>
>> I was pretty sure they were gone and I had searched the group but had not
>> found what I thought was a definitive answer.
>> I've already explored using the SDF Signature control...should be easy
>> enough. My client however would prefer a commercial solution, especially
>> when the SDF Signature control is officially unsupported.
>>
>> James
>>
>
>