Thanks. Not the answer I was hoping for but it does at least close that
"Florin Lazar [MSFT]" <florinlazar@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:eMMgIp7CEHA.3804@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi Brian,
>
> First, ServicedComponents don't support (Logical)CallContext.
> Second, I personally don't know of any way of disabling what you call
"DCOM
> optimizations" for very simple methods.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Florin Lazar - Microsoft - [
http://blogs.msdn.com/florinlazar ]
> Please do not send email directly to this alias. This alias is for
newsgroup
> purposes only.
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
>
>
>
> "Brian Tyler" <brianmtyler@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:OgkjUq7%23DHA.1456@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > Short Question:
> > Is there any way to shut off the "DCOM optimization" that is used when
> > making a remote call from a .NET client to an ServicedComponent?
> >
> > Longer Version:
> >
> > From the recent MSDN article
> >
>
(
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/04/03/ExceptionsinCOM/default.aspx > > ) and from a blog I found searching around
> > (
http://staff.newtelligence.net/clemensv/PermaLink.aspx?guid=189), it
> > appears that in most cases, Enterprise Services using .NET remoting for
> the
> > serialization/deserialization and DCOM for the transport when doing
remote
> > calls to ServicedComponent objects (ie remote .NET COM+ applications).
> > However, there appears to be an optimization that takes place when the
> > method's API is simple enough (to quote the blog: "with two exceptions:
QC
> > and calls with isomorphic call sigs").
> >
> > For example, my test component has two methods:
> >
> > ShowMessage()
> >
> > and
> >
> > ShowMessage(System.Text.StringBuilder b)
> >
> > The first one is "optimized" and the second one is not.
> >
> > KEY POINT: When the system is optimized, the LogicalCallContext is
> dropped.
> >
> > If I attempt to get data stored in the LCC in the first method, it does
> not
> > appear - but it is there in the second method.
> >
> > For various reasons, I want a consistent behavior where the LCC is
> > propogated. I am working on the assumption that it can only be done by
> > somehow turning off this optimization. Unfortunately, I can't get rid of
> the
> > LCC nor can I change the APIs. Any other options?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >
>
>