|
|
You're in the
dotnet academic
group:Search a Dataset
dotnet academic:
I am rather frustrated by the fact that i cant seam to find a way to search/locate in a dataset. I would prefer not to have to use the Filter. At the moment i am "walking" thru the dataset, which can be hairy as the recordset might rather large. I have optimised the SQL statement to try and return a smaller set of data back, but this still is not the solution. Can anyone help. As i said before, i would hate to have to revert to using the filtering. many thanks for your time. Rgds Miro
Hi Miro,
I am not sure I understand what you mean by "filter", but why not just use the SQL Where clause to return what you want from the database? bill burrows [quoted text, click to view] "Miro" <miro@digibility.co.za> wrote in message news:045901c3cdf1$2eae8eb0$a601280a@phx.gbl... > Hi All, > > I am rather frustrated by the fact that i cant seam to > find a way to search/locate in a dataset. I would prefer > not to have to use the Filter. At the moment i > am "walking" thru the dataset, which can be hairy as the > recordset might rather large. I have optimised the SQL > statement to try and return a smaller set of data back, > but this still is not the solution. > > Can anyone help. As i said before, i would hate to have > to revert to using the filtering. > > many thanks for your time. > > Rgds > Miro >
The SQL already returns a small dataset, but it might
still contain 15+ records and i dont wanna have to For Each, i wanna search in this dataset. Does that make more sense ? [quoted text, click to view] >-----Original Message-----
>Hi Miro, > >I am not sure I understand what you mean by "filter", but why not just use >the SQL Where clause to return what you want from the database? > >bill burrows > >"Miro" <miro@digibility.co.za> wrote in message >news:045901c3cdf1$2eae8eb0$a601280a@phx.gbl... >> Hi All, >> >> I am rather frustrated by the fact that i cant seam to >> find a way to search/locate in a dataset. I would prefer >> not to have to use the Filter. At the moment i >> am "walking" thru the dataset, which can be hairy as the >> recordset might rather large. I have optimised the SQL >> statement to try and return a smaller set of data back, >> but this still is not the solution. >> >> Can anyone help. As i said before, i would hate to have >> to revert to using the filtering. >> >> many thanks for your time. >> >> Rgds >> Miro >> > > >.
I also would like to utilize a text box with a button used
to submint a search for one specific item. Much like one uses a form and "GET" or "POST" to obtain one specific item from a Dataset. In my case an employee listing of 900+ people where I want just one name to come back, like Anderson for a last name. I am trying to stay away from ADO.NET for now and having just a flat file doesn't meet with the approval of the group who wants all items returned from a database. Thanks in advance, Darran [quoted text, click to view] >-----Original Message-----
>The SQL already returns a small dataset, but it might >still contain 15+ records and i dont wanna have to For >Each, i wanna search in this dataset. > >Does that make more sense ? > > >>-----Original Message----- >>Hi Miro, >> >>I am not sure I understand what you mean by "filter", but >why not just use >>the SQL Where clause to return what you want from the >database? >> >>bill burrows >> >>"Miro" <miro@digibility.co.za> wrote in message >>news:045901c3cdf1$2eae8eb0$a601280a@phx.gbl... >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I am rather frustrated by the fact that i cant seam to >>> find a way to search/locate in a dataset. I would >prefer >>> not to have to use the Filter. At the moment i >>> am "walking" thru the dataset, which can be hairy as the >>> recordset might rather large. I have optimised the SQL >>> statement to try and return a smaller set of data back, >>> but this still is not the solution. >>> >>> Can anyone help. As i said before, i would hate to >have >>> to revert to using the filtering. >>> >>> many thanks for your time. >>> >>> Rgds >>> Miro >>> >> >> >>. >> >.
Have you tried using a DataView?
-- Gerry O'Brien Visual Developer .NET MVP [quoted text, click to view] "Miro" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:037101c3d6a2$e01e3d30$a001280a@phx.gbl... > The SQL already returns a small dataset, but it might > still contain 15+ records and i dont wanna have to For > Each, i wanna search in this dataset. > > Does that make more sense ? > > > >-----Original Message----- > >Hi Miro, > > > >I am not sure I understand what you mean by "filter", but > why not just use > >the SQL Where clause to return what you want from the > database? > > > >bill burrows > > > >"Miro" <miro@digibility.co.za> wrote in message > >news:045901c3cdf1$2eae8eb0$a601280a@phx.gbl... > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I am rather frustrated by the fact that i cant seam to > >> find a way to search/locate in a dataset. I would > prefer > >> not to have to use the Filter. At the moment i > >> am "walking" thru the dataset, which can be hairy as the > >> recordset might rather large. I have optimised the SQL > >> statement to try and return a smaller set of data back, > >> but this still is not the solution. > >> > >> Can anyone help. As i said before, i would hate to > have > >> to revert to using the filtering. > >> > >> many thanks for your time. > >> > >> Rgds > >> Miro > >> > > > > > >. > >
Have you tried using the Select method of the DataTable object?
oDataSet.Tables[0].Select() For more info (watch for wrapping): http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpref/html/frlrfsystemdatadatatableclassselecttopic.asp [quoted text, click to view] "Miro" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:037101c3d6a2$e01e3d30$a001280a@phx.gbl... > The SQL already returns a small dataset, but it might > still contain 15+ records and i dont wanna have to For > Each, i wanna search in this dataset. > > Does that make more sense ? > > > >-----Original Message----- > >Hi Miro, > > > >I am not sure I understand what you mean by "filter", but > why not just use > >the SQL Where clause to return what you want from the > database? > > > >bill burrows > > > >"Miro" <miro@digibility.co.za> wrote in message > >news:045901c3cdf1$2eae8eb0$a601280a@phx.gbl... > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I am rather frustrated by the fact that i cant seam to > >> find a way to search/locate in a dataset. I would > prefer > >> not to have to use the Filter. At the moment i > >> am "walking" thru the dataset, which can be hairy as the > >> recordset might rather large. I have optimised the SQL > >> statement to try and return a smaller set of data back, > >> but this still is not the solution. > >> > >> Can anyone help. As i said before, i would hate to > have > >> to revert to using the filtering. > >> > >> many thanks for your time. > >> > >> Rgds > >> Miro > >> > > > > > >. > >
you mean you want to filter the dataset?
[quoted text, click to view] "Spiff" <one_of_bunch@nospam2me.hotmail.com> wrote in message http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpref/html/news:#GFBhLoAEHA.392@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > Have you tried using the Select method of the DataTable object? > > oDataSet.Tables[0].Select() > > For more info (watch for wrapping): > frlrfsystemdatadatatableclassselecttopic.asp [quoted text, click to view] > > "Miro" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:037101c3d6a2$e01e3d30$a001280a@phx.gbl... > > The SQL already returns a small dataset, but it might > > still contain 15+ records and i dont wanna have to For > > Each, i wanna search in this dataset. > > > > Does that make more sense ? > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >Hi Miro, > > > > > >I am not sure I understand what you mean by "filter", but > > why not just use > > >the SQL Where clause to return what you want from the > > database? > > > > > >bill burrows > > > > > >"Miro" <miro@digibility.co.za> wrote in message > > >news:045901c3cdf1$2eae8eb0$a601280a@phx.gbl... > > >> Hi All, > > >> > > >> I am rather frustrated by the fact that i cant seam to > > >> find a way to search/locate in a dataset. I would > > prefer > > >> not to have to use the Filter. At the moment i > > >> am "walking" thru the dataset, which can be hairy as the > > >> recordset might rather large. I have optimised the SQL > > >> statement to try and return a smaller set of data back, > > >> but this still is not the solution. > > >> > > >> Can anyone help. As i said before, i would hate to > > have > > >> to revert to using the filtering. > > >> > > >> many thanks for your time. > > >> > > >> Rgds > > >> Miro > > >> > > > > > > > > >. > > > > >
Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.
|
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
| home · blog · groups | Questions? Comments? Contact the dn |