wrote:
> Hi,
> If you want to place things into the GAC it must be strong named.
>
> If for some reason you don't want to do that (because it itself relies on
> 3rd party assemblies that are not strong-named) then you don't have to make
> it COM visible and be in at the GAC - use the /codebase option.
>
> However, only one of your assemblies can use the /codebase option - you
> cannot have two different copies in different paths. Ensure you unregister
> before registering with /codebase as well.
>
> Cheers,
> MickyD
>
> "Elvian" <roninfi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1184750701.031758.80840@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I've got a little problem. I used to develop a component with Visual
> > Studio .NET 2003 (.NET framework 1.1), and registering this assembly
> > to COM interop with a function only writing keys in the registry
> > (regedit).
>
> > This way, I was able to include my activeX component in a former
> > Visual Studio 6 c++ project (~10 000 files).
>
> > The problem is when I switched to Visual Studio C# Orcas express
> > Editionm and using the .NET framework 3.0
>
> > The COM registration doesn't work anymore, and I'm trying to use
> > regasm to register the assembly, but it doesn't seems to be working,
> > because I'm not allowed to register the assembly in the GAC, nor to
> > provide a strong name for it.
>
> > Does anyone knows if there is a way, just like the wat I was doing
> > things before, i.e. writing directly keys in the registry, or at
> > least, avoiding the use of the GAC and strong names ?
>
> > Thank you in advance.
>
> > CD- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -