>From: Daniel Karlsson <daniel.karlsson@n0sp4m.digidoc.com>
>X-Newsreader: AspNNTP 1.50 (ActionJackson.com)
>Subject: MSCORWKS loaded instead of MSCORSVR on MP-Machine
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Message-ID: <e8F4j4oLEHA.3216@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance
>Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 01:35:47 -0700
>NNTP-Posting-Host: actionjackson133.dsl.frii.net 216.17.147.133
>Lines: 1
>Path: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA05.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
>Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance:7511
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance
>
>Hello,
>
>I've deployed a service hosting some classes for remoting. It's a
>NT-Service and it runs on a dual-processor win2003 server.
>
>Using the Process explorer It's quite obvious that the runtime loads the
>MSCORWKS instead of the MSCORSVR. Shouldn't the runtime load the
>server-version on a multi-cpu machine?
>
>Please don't tell me to use the COMPLUS_BUILDFLAVOR directive since it's
>not supported!
>
>I'd like a 100% supported and perfered way of getting the server-runtime
>going. And I dont want to create my own host using unmanaged code
>eather!
>
>Please advice, I've read alot regarding this on usenet but I haven't
>seen a good solution yet
>
>Sincerely,
>Daniel Karlsson
>
>*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
>Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
>

""Chris Lyon [MSFT]"" <clyon@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:VqnIMytLEHA.3900@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl...
> Hi Daniel
>
> No, there is no supported way with v1.0 or v1.1 to specify server GC mode
without an unmanaged host.
>
> With Whidbey (v2.0) and v1.1 SP1 (due out this summer) there will be the
ability to specify the gc mode in the application's config file.
>
> Hope that helps
> -Chris
>
> --------------------
> >From: Daniel Karlsson <daniel.karlsson@n0sp4m.digidoc.com>
> >X-Newsreader: AspNNTP 1.50 (ActionJackson.com)
> >Subject: MSCORWKS loaded instead of MSCORSVR on MP-Machine
> >Mime-Version: 1.0
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >Message-ID: <e8F4j4oLEHA.3216@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
> >Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance
> >Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 01:35:47 -0700
> >NNTP-Posting-Host: actionjackson133.dsl.frii.net 216.17.147.133
> >Lines: 1
> >Path:

> >Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance:7511
> >X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance
> >
> >Hello,
> >
> >I've deployed a service hosting some classes for remoting. It's a
> >NT-Service and it runs on a dual-processor win2003 server.
> >
> >Using the Process explorer It's quite obvious that the runtime loads the
> >MSCORWKS instead of the MSCORSVR. Shouldn't the runtime load the
> >server-version on a multi-cpu machine?
> >
> >Please don't tell me to use the COMPLUS_BUILDFLAVOR directive since it's
> >not supported!
> >
> >I'd like a 100% supported and perfered way of getting the server-runtime
> >going. And I dont want to create my own host using unmanaged code
> >eather!
> >
> >Please advice, I've read alot regarding this on usenet but I haven't
> >seen a good solution yet
> >
> >Sincerely,
> >Daniel Karlsson
> >
> >*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
> >Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
> >
>
>
> --
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
> http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
>
> Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this

>

"Daniel Karlsson" <daniel.karlsson@n0sp4m.digidoc.com> wrote in message
news:u86HzW5LEHA.2584@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> First of all, thanks for your quick and accurate answer!
>
> Now, is there any info about SP1 and the contents of it? Perhaps a
> beta-program? I'm a MSDN-universal subscriber
>
> Sincerely,
> Daniel Karlsson
>
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
> Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!

"Vikram" <vikram404@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23kMg8p6LEHA.556@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Ya.
> Even I am curious. Is there some info on what SP1 will fix ?
>
> Vikram
>
> "Daniel Karlsson" <daniel.karlsson@n0sp4m.digidoc.com> wrote in message
> news:u86HzW5LEHA.2584@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > First of all, thanks for your quick and accurate answer!
> >
> > Now, is there any info about SP1 and the contents of it? Perhaps a
> > beta-program? I'm a MSDN-universal subscriber
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Daniel Karlsson
> >
> > *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
> > Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
>
>

>From: "Matt Davey" <Matt.Davey@finetixDOTcom>
>References: <VqnIMytLEHA.3900@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl> <u86HzW5LEHA.2584@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl> <#kMg8p6LEHA.556@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
>Subject: Re: MSCORWKS loaded instead of MSCORSVR on MP-Machine
>Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 23:27:09 +0100
>Lines: 32
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
>Message-ID: <ezmKut8LEHA.2632@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance
>NNTP-Posting-Host: spc1-hers1-3-0-cust151.lond.broadband.ntl.com 80.0.63.151
>Path: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA05.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
>Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance:7523
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance
>
>1.1 and .NET 2.0 will allow the GC to be specified via a config setting,
>which is not currently possible. Example of the 1.0/1.1 bug would be
>running a server .NET app on a 16 CPU Windows DataCenter OS. The WKS GC
>would be used today, whereas in reality the SVR GC should be selected
>
>Later
>http://weblogs.asp.net/mdavey/
>
>
>"Vikram" <vikram404@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:%23kMg8p6LEHA.556@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> Ya.
>> Even I am curious. Is there some info on what SP1 will fix ?
>>
>> Vikram
>>
>> "Daniel Karlsson" <daniel.karlsson@n0sp4m.digidoc.com> wrote in message
>> news:u86HzW5LEHA.2584@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> > First of all, thanks for your quick and accurate answer!
>> >
>> > Now, is there any info about SP1 and the contents of it? Perhaps a
>> > beta-program? I'm a MSDN-universal subscriber
>> >
>> > Sincerely,
>> > Daniel Karlsson
>> >
>> > *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
>> > Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
>>
>>
>
>
>

""Chris Lyon [MSFT]"" <clyon@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:s8IVVKTMEHA.3464@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl...
> Hi Matt
>
> This behaviour is actually *by design*, not a bug. v2.0 and v1.1 SP1 will

> Server GC is by hosting the runtime.
>
> If you could point me to any official documentation that says Server GC

>
> Thanks!
> -Chris
>
> --------------------
> >From: "Matt Davey" <Matt.Davey@finetixDOTcom>
> >References: <VqnIMytLEHA.3900@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl>

> >Subject: Re: MSCORWKS loaded instead of MSCORSVR on MP-Machine
> >Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 23:27:09 +0100
> >Lines: 32
> >X-Priority: 3
> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
> >Message-ID: <ezmKut8LEHA.2632@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
> >Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance
> >NNTP-Posting-Host: spc1-hers1-3-0-cust151.lond.broadband.ntl.com
80.0.63.151
> >Path:

> >Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance:7523
> >X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance
> >
> >1.1 and .NET 2.0 will allow the GC to be specified via a config setting,
> >which is not currently possible. Example of the 1.0/1.1 bug would be
> >running a server .NET app on a 16 CPU Windows DataCenter OS. The WKS GC
> >would be used today, whereas in reality the SVR GC should be selected
> >
> >Later
> >http://weblogs.asp.net/mdavey/
> >
> >
> >"Vikram" <vikram404@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:%23kMg8p6LEHA.556@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >> Ya.
> >> Even I am curious. Is there some info on what SP1 will fix ?
> >>
> >> Vikram
> >>
> >> "Daniel Karlsson" <daniel.karlsson@n0sp4m.digidoc.com> wrote in message
> >> news:u86HzW5LEHA.2584@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> >> > First of all, thanks for your quick and accurate answer!
> >> >
> >> > Now, is there any info about SP1 and the contents of it? Perhaps a
> >> > beta-program? I'm a MSDN-universal subscriber
> >> >
> >> > Sincerely,
> >> > Daniel Karlsson
> >> >
> >> > *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
> >> > Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
> http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
>
> Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this

>

"Daniel Karlsson" <daniel.karlsson@n0sp4m.digidoc.com> wrote in message
news:e8F4j4oLEHA.3216@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hello,
>
> I've deployed a service hosting some classes for remoting. It's a
> NT-Service and it runs on a dual-processor win2003 server.
>
> Using the Process explorer It's quite obvious that the runtime loads the
> MSCORWKS instead of the MSCORSVR. Shouldn't the runtime load the
> server-version on a multi-cpu machine?
>
> Please don't tell me to use the COMPLUS_BUILDFLAVOR directive since it's
> not supported!
>
> I'd like a 100% supported and perfered way of getting the server-runtime
> going. And I dont want to create my own host using unmanaged code
> eather!
>
> Please advice, I've read alot regarding this on usenet but I haven't
> seen a good solution yet
>
> Sincerely,
> Daniel Karlsson
>
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
> Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!

"Daniel Karlsson" <daniel.karlsson@n0sp4m.digidoc.com> wrote in message
news:u4UhZpmMEHA.2500@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> I've read that the COMPLUS_BUILDFLAVOR is a unsupported way of getting
> the server-runtime and I refuse to use it because of that =P
>
> Since our production system is a multi-server webfarm that is
> mission-critical for our customers I can't rely on unsupported features!
>
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
> Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!

>From: "Ice" <ice@nospam.com>
>References: <OKrCGReMEHA.2508@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl> <u4UhZpmMEHA.2500@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>
>Subject: Re: MSCORWKS loaded instead of MSCORSVR on MP-Machine
>Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 20:55:54 -0500
>Lines: 19
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
>Message-ID: <ueHTF1wMEHA.1192@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.28.230.35
>Path: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl
>Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance:7556
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance
>
>So in essence you are saying that running the server gc is unsupported?
>Bottomline is that it loads the proper assembly - I think MSFT doesn't want
>that to be the way we accomplish it, but it works.
>
>And yes, I do have a mission-critical app :)
>
>ice
>"Daniel Karlsson" <daniel.karlsson@n0sp4m.digidoc.com> wrote in message
>news:u4UhZpmMEHA.2500@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> I've read that the COMPLUS_BUILDFLAVOR is a unsupported way of getting
>> the server-runtime and I refuse to use it because of that =P
>>
>> Since our production system is a multi-server webfarm that is
>> mission-critical for our customers I can't rely on unsupported features!
>>
>> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
>> Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
>
>
>

""Chris Lyon [MSFT]"" <clyon@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:vubBHvdOEHA.2608@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl...
> Hi Ice
>
> Running Server GC is indeed a supported scenario, as long as it's done via

> guaranteed to remain constant between versions of the runtime, nor will MS
support issue a fix for bugs in server GC specified via that setting).
>
> The only way Microsoft-supported way to specify Server GC with v1.0 and

> us/dndotnet/html/dotnetperftechs.asp)
>
> If you have a mission-critical application that you feel requires Server

>
> Hope that helps
> -Chris
>
>
> --------------------
> >From: "Ice" <ice@nospam.com>
> >References: <OKrCGReMEHA.2508@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
<u4UhZpmMEHA.2500@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>
> >Subject: Re: MSCORWKS loaded instead of MSCORSVR on MP-Machine
> >Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 20:55:54 -0500
> >Lines: 19
> >X-Priority: 3
> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
> >Message-ID: <ueHTF1wMEHA.1192@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>
> >Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance
> >NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.28.230.35
> >Path:

> >Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance:7556
> >X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance
> >
> >So in essence you are saying that running the server gc is unsupported?
> >Bottomline is that it loads the proper assembly - I think MSFT doesn't
want
> >that to be the way we accomplish it, but it works.
> >
> >And yes, I do have a mission-critical app :)
> >
> >ice
> >"Daniel Karlsson" <daniel.karlsson@n0sp4m.digidoc.com> wrote in message
> >news:u4UhZpmMEHA.2500@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> >> I've read that the COMPLUS_BUILDFLAVOR is a unsupported way of getting
> >> the server-runtime and I refuse to use it because of that =P
> >>
> >> Since our production system is a multi-server webfarm that is
> >> mission-critical for our customers I can't rely on unsupported
features!
> >>
> >> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
> >> Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
> http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
>
> Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this

>

In article <vubBHvdOEHA.2608@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl>, Chris Lyon [MSFT] wrote:
> The only way Microsoft-supported way to specify Server GC with v1.0 and v1.1 is by hosting the runtime (see
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-
> us/dndotnet/html/dotnetperftechs.asp)

>Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:17:53 EDT
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>X-Newsreader: Virtual Access Open Source http://www.virtual-access.org/
>Message-ID: <VA.0000005a.14a5f6f1@spamintrex.net>
>Subject: Re: MSCORWKS loaded instead of MSCORSVR on MP-Machine
>From: Mike Blake-Knox <mikebkdont@spamintrex.net>
>Reply-To: mikebkdont@spamintrex.net
>References: <OKrCGReMEHA.2508@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl> <u4UhZpmMEHA.2500@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl> <ueHTF1wMEHA.1192@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>
<vubBHvdOEHA.2608@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl>
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.194.244.137
>Lines: 1
>Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl
>Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance:8020
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance
>
>In article <vubBHvdOEHA.2608@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl>, Chris Lyon [MSFT] wrote:
>> The only way Microsoft-supported way to specify Server GC with v1.0 and v1.1 is by hosting the runtime (see
>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-
>> us/dndotnet/html/dotnetperftechs.asp)
>
>Did you really mean to say that using the Garbage Collection Mode application property in the .NET Framework
>Configuration .msc isn't supported? Or that it doesn't work?
>
>Thanks
>
>Mike
>
>