| Groups | Blog | Home |
dotnet remoting : HttpChannels registering different ports are conflicting in the same app
I am registering 2 HttpChannels in the same app, one without a custom provider and one with. The first channel that has no custom provider overrides the second one and does not let the custom sink be part of the second channel. They are both registering different ports in the same application and are also named differently. The only way I could make this work is by turning one of them to be a Tcp channel. Does anyone have an answer to this problem? thanks, vineet
Here is the sample code that I tried:
//Channel 1 ListDictionary channel1Prop =3D new ListDictionary(); channel1Prop.Add("port", 5555); channel1Prop.Add("name", "channel1"); HttpChannel channel1 =3D new HttpChannel(channel1Prop, null, null); ChannelServices.RegisterChannel(channel1); //Channel 2 ListDictionary channel2Prop =3D new ListDictionary(); channel2Prop.Add("name", "channel2"); BinaryClientFormatterSinkProvider binaryProvider =3D new = BinaryClientFormatterSinkProvider(); MyCustomClientChannelSinkProvider customClientProvider =3D new = MyCustomClientChannelSinkProvider(); binaryProvider.Next =3D customClientProvider; HttpChannel channel2 =3D new HttpChannel(channel2Prop, binaryProvider, = null); ChannelServices.RegisterChannel(channel2); Please advise why the second channel would not configure with a custom = sink provider. thanks again, vineet [quoted text, click to view] "Vineet Singla" <vsingla@act.com> wrote in message =
news:%2345VuccZDHA.3436@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > Hi, > I am registering 2 HttpChannels in the same app, one without a custom > provider and one with. The first channel that has no custom provider > overrides the second one and does not let the custom sink be part of = the > second channel. They are both registering different ports in the same > application and are also named differently. The only way I could make = this > work is by turning one of them to be a Tcp channel. Does anyone have = an > answer to this problem? >=20 > thanks, > vineet >=20
I came accross to the same problem,in my web
application,there are more then two pages to call remoting service.If as least two pages post request at one time,it will be happened than one will throw exception ,channel has been registed. [quoted text, click to view] >-----Original Message-----
>Hi, >I am registering 2 HttpChannels in the same app, one without a custom >provider and one with. The first channel that has no custom provider >overrides the second one and does not let the custom sink be part of the >second channel. They are both registering different ports in the same >application and are also named differently. The only way I could make this >work is by turning one of them to be a Tcp channel. Does anyone have an >answer to this problem? > >thanks, >vineet > > >.
I have resolve this problem.
Sample code is: BinaryClientFormatterSinkProvider mysinkprovider = new BinaryClientFormatterSinkProvider(); TcpClientChannel tcc = new TcpClientChannel ("channel_1",mysinkprovider); ChannelServices.RegisterChannel(tcc); //do something ....... ChannelServices.UnregisterChannel(tcc); Now my web application can support at least two pages to call remoting service at one time! (I do test:2 and 3 pages call remoting service at one time,no exception has been thrown.) You can try it! [quoted text, click to view] >-----Original Message-----
>I came accross to the same problem,in my web >application,there are more then two pages to call >remoting service.If as least two pages post request at >one time,it will be happened than one will throw >exception ,channel has been registed. >>-----Original Message----- >>Hi, >>I am registering 2 HttpChannels in the same app, one >without a custom >>provider and one with. The first channel that has no >custom provider >>overrides the second one and does not let the custom >sink be part of the >>second channel. They are both registering different >ports in the same >>application and are also named differently. The only way >I could make this >>work is by turning one of them to be a Tcp channel. Does >anyone have an >>answer to this problem? >> >>thanks, >>vineet
Even though this might work, I'd acutally recommend a different approach
like the one presented at http://www.ingorammer.com/RemotingFAQ/REGISTER_HOW_MANY_CHANNELS.html You might otherwise run into problems when more than one user calls your ASPX page at the same time. Cheers, -Ingo Independent .NET and Web Services Consultant Author of "Advanced .NET Remoting" Microsoft Regional Director - Austria http://www.ingorammer.com Read my "Distributed .NET Newsletter" at http://www.ingorammer.com/NL [quoted text, click to view] "gullit" <goolit@sina.com> wrote in message news:09e501c366e1$9cdb2c30$a301280a@phx.gbl... > I have resolve this problem. > Sample code is: > > BinaryClientFormatterSinkProvider mysinkprovider = new > BinaryClientFormatterSinkProvider(); > TcpClientChannel tcc = new TcpClientChannel > ("channel_1",mysinkprovider); > ChannelServices.RegisterChannel(tcc); > > //do something > ...... > > ChannelServices.UnregisterChannel(tcc); > > Now my web application can support at least two pages to > call remoting service at one time! > (I do test:2 and 3 pages call remoting service at one > time,no exception has been thrown.) > You can try it! > > >-----Original Message----- > >I came accross to the same problem,in my web > >application,there are more then two pages to call > >remoting service.If as least two pages post request at > >one time,it will be happened than one will throw > >exception ,channel has been registed. > >>-----Original Message----- > >>Hi, > >>I am registering 2 HttpChannels in the same app, one > >without a custom > >>provider and one with. The first channel that has no > >custom provider > >>overrides the second one and does not let the custom > >sink be part of the > >>second channel. They are both registering different > >ports in the same > >>application and are also named differently. The only > way > >I could make this > >>work is by turning one of them to be a Tcp channel. > Does > >anyone have an > >>answer to this problem? > >> > >>thanks, > >>vineet >
Ingo,you are right,thanks a lot!
[quoted text, click to view] >-----Original Message-----
>Even though this might work, I'd acutally recommend a different approach >like the one presented at >http://www.ingorammer.com/RemotingFAQ/REGISTER_HOW_MANY_C HANNELS.html > >You might otherwise run into problems when more than one user calls your >ASPX page at the same time. > >Cheers, >-Ingo > >Independent .NET and Web Services Consultant >Author of "Advanced .NET Remoting" >Microsoft Regional Director - Austria >http://www.ingorammer.com > >Read my "Distributed .NET Newsletter" at http://www.ingorammer.com/NL > > >"gullit" <goolit@sina.com> wrote in message >news:09e501c366e1$9cdb2c30$a301280a@phx.gbl... >> I have resolve this problem. >> Sample code is: >> >> BinaryClientFormatterSinkProvider mysinkprovider = new >> BinaryClientFormatterSinkProvider(); >> TcpClientChannel tcc = new TcpClientChannel >> ("channel_1",mysinkprovider); >> ChannelServices.RegisterChannel(tcc); >> >> //do something >> ...... >> >> ChannelServices.UnregisterChannel(tcc); >> >> Now my web application can support at least two pages to >> call remoting service at one time! >> (I do test:2 and 3 pages call remoting service at one >> time,no exception has been thrown.) >> You can try it! >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >I came accross to the same problem,in my web >> >application,there are more then two pages to call >> >remoting service.If as least two pages post request at >> >one time,it will be happened than one will throw >> >exception ,channel has been registed. >> >>-----Original Message----- >> >>Hi, >> >>I am registering 2 HttpChannels in the same app, one >> >without a custom >> >>provider and one with. The first channel that has no >> >custom provider >> >>overrides the second one and does not let the custom >> >sink be part of the >> >>second channel. They are both registering different >> >ports in the same >> >>application and are also named differently. The only >> way >> >I could make this >> >>work is by turning one of them to be a Tcp channel. >> Does >> >anyone have an >> >>answer to this problem? >> >> >> >>thanks, >> >>vineet >> > > >.
Ingo,by the way,can you tell me what does it mean?
props["clientConnectionLimit"] = 0; this means connection number is unlimited? [quoted text, click to view] >-----Original Message-----
>Even though this might work, I'd acutally recommend a different approach >like the one presented at >http://www.ingorammer.com/RemotingFAQ/REGISTER_HOW_MANY_C HANNELS.html > >You might otherwise run into problems when more than one user calls your >ASPX page at the same time. > >Cheers, >-Ingo > >Independent .NET and Web Services Consultant >Author of "Advanced .NET Remoting" >Microsoft Regional Director - Austria >http://www.ingorammer.com > >Read my "Distributed .NET Newsletter" at http://www.ingorammer.com/NL > > >"gullit" <goolit@sina.com> wrote in message >news:09e501c366e1$9cdb2c30$a301280a@phx.gbl... >> I have resolve this problem. >> Sample code is: >> >> BinaryClientFormatterSinkProvider mysinkprovider = new >> BinaryClientFormatterSinkProvider(); >> TcpClientChannel tcc = new TcpClientChannel >> ("channel_1",mysinkprovider); >> ChannelServices.RegisterChannel(tcc); >> >> //do something >> ...... >> >> ChannelServices.UnregisterChannel(tcc); >> >> Now my web application can support at least two pages to >> call remoting service at one time! >> (I do test:2 and 3 pages call remoting service at one >> time,no exception has been thrown.) >> You can try it! >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >I came accross to the same problem,in my web >> >application,there are more then two pages to call >> >remoting service.If as least two pages post request at >> >one time,it will be happened than one will throw >> >exception ,channel has been registed. >> >>-----Original Message----- >> >>Hi, >> >>I am registering 2 HttpChannels in the same app, one >> >without a custom >> >>provider and one with. The first channel that has no >> >custom provider >> >>overrides the second one and does not let the custom >> >sink be part of the >> >>second channel. They are both registering different >> >ports in the same >> >>application and are also named differently. The only >> way >> >I could make this >> >>work is by turning one of them to be a Tcp channel. >> Does >> >anyone have an >> >>answer to this problem? >> >> >> >>thanks, >> >>vineet >> > > >.
Ingo, your approach did give some insight on the Channel architecture.
However, if you look at my code, the first channel is for a server and the second one is for a client. These are completely separate components in the same app. The problem is that in both the cases we need HttpChannels and only one uses the custom provider. How can I isolate them. Is appdomain a solution to it? Can you tell me how to register a client and server channels in different appdomains? vineet "Ingo Rammer" <PLEASE_DONT_EMAIL_QUESTIONS____ASK_HERE_INSTEAD@ingorammer.com> wrote in message news:ulsgAQwZDHA.2572@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... [quoted text, click to view] > Even though this might work, I'd acutally recommend a different approach > like the one presented at > http://www.ingorammer.com/RemotingFAQ/REGISTER_HOW_MANY_CHANNELS.html > > You might otherwise run into problems when more than one user calls your > ASPX page at the same time. > > Cheers, > -Ingo > > Independent .NET and Web Services Consultant > Author of "Advanced .NET Remoting" > Microsoft Regional Director - Austria > http://www.ingorammer.com > > Read my "Distributed .NET Newsletter" at http://www.ingorammer.com/NL > > > "gullit" <goolit@sina.com> wrote in message > news:09e501c366e1$9cdb2c30$a301280a@phx.gbl... > > I have resolve this problem. > > Sample code is: > > > > BinaryClientFormatterSinkProvider mysinkprovider = new > > BinaryClientFormatterSinkProvider(); > > TcpClientChannel tcc = new TcpClientChannel > > ("channel_1",mysinkprovider); > > ChannelServices.RegisterChannel(tcc); > > > > //do something > > ...... > > > > ChannelServices.UnregisterChannel(tcc); > > > > Now my web application can support at least two pages to > > call remoting service at one time! > > (I do test:2 and 3 pages call remoting service at one > > time,no exception has been thrown.) > > You can try it! > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >I came accross to the same problem,in my web > > >application,there are more then two pages to call > > >remoting service.If as least two pages post request at > > >one time,it will be happened than one will throw > > >exception ,channel has been registed. > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >>Hi, > > >>I am registering 2 HttpChannels in the same app, one > > >without a custom > > >>provider and one with. The first channel that has no > > >custom provider > > >>overrides the second one and does not let the custom > > >sink be part of the > > >>second channel. They are both registering different > > >ports in the same > > >>application and are also named differently. The only > > way > > >I could make this > > >>work is by turning one of them to be a Tcp channel. > > Does > > >anyone have an > > >>answer to this problem? > > >> > > >>thanks, > > >>vineet > > > >
Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.
|
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
| home · blog · groups | Questions? Comments? Contact the dn |