> I'm afraid this is the only solution. The connection is established for
> the method call.
>
> Sunny
>
> In article <ee5KVRENEHA.3596@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>,
> nomailadress@yahoo.net says...
> > Hi,
> >
> > how can I verify wether the TransparentProxy object returned by
> > someVariable = RemotingServices.Connect( typeof( Interface ),
anyServerURI )
> > as Interface;
> >
> > is active or not? I call this method and get a TransparentProxy in
> > "someVariable" wether the server is online or not.
> >
> > I know I can call a "dummy" method like someVariable.Hello() on the
server,
> > but I don?t think that this is a good solution.
> >
> > Does anybody have a better idea without using channel-specific methods?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Tobias
> >
> >
> >
> >

> Marshal and Disconnect are used at server side to expose the object to
> remoting.
>
> While at client side you do not have the object, but a proxy to it. So,
> when your proxy goes out of scope, or is set to null, that is enough.
> You do not need explicitly to disconnect the object.
>
> Sunny
>
> In article <OOL2uvENEHA.1032@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>,
> nomailadress@yahoo.net says...
> > Thank you, Sunny.
> >
> > Another Question: Is there any counterpart to
RemotingServices.Connect(...)?
> >
> > Like RemotingServices.Disconnect(...) after
RemotingServices.Marshal(...).
> >
> >
> > "Sunny" <sunnyask@icebergwireless.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> > news:OY2H3pENEHA.644@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > > I'm afraid this is the only solution. The connection is established
for
> > > the method call.
> > >
> > > Sunny
> > >
> > > In article <ee5KVRENEHA.3596@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>,
> > > nomailadress@yahoo.net says...
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > how can I verify wether the TransparentProxy object returned by
> > > > someVariable = RemotingServices.Connect( typeof( Interface ),
> > anyServerURI )
> > > > as Interface;
> > > >
> > > > is active or not? I call this method and get a TransparentProxy in
> > > > "someVariable" wether the server is online or not.
> > > >
> > > > I know I can call a "dummy" method like someVariable.Hello() on the
> > server,
> > > > but I don?t think that this is a good solution.
> > > >
> > > > Does anybody have a better idea without using channel-specific
methods?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Tobias
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >