Groups | Blog | Home
all groups > dotnet remoting > june 2004 >

dotnet remoting : what do you think about this...


AA
6/24/2004 3:58:49 PM
http://www.mailframe.net/Products/PeerChannel.htm

Sound interesting no?

Allen Anderson
6/24/2004 4:09:47 PM
never heard of it. Would be nice to see more channel vendors though.

[quoted text, click to view]
Sunny
6/24/2004 4:42:02 PM
Sounds good for free solution :)

Please, if you try it, post some comments here :)


Sunny

In article <udWqFbiWEHA.1764@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>, aa@personal.net.py
says...
[quoted text, click to view]
Elp
6/25/2004 1:03:14 AM

[quoted text, click to view]

Looks like a competitor for Genuine Channels. I think that i actually saw
this one a while ago. But there are no mention of any price or terms of use.
Is it free? Open source? And the page says that it requires Windows 2000/XP
and .NET 1.1. Does it means that Windows 98 and .NET 1.0 are not supported?
Why not? Any FAQ? Too many unanswered questions. I'll stick with good ol'
genuine channel for the moment. But if it is free, it may be a very good
thing for free software developpers who don't want to pay for a
bidirectionnal channel.

Allen Anderson
6/28/2004 8:43:30 AM
did you try this other channel out Sunny? I haven't had time to look
into it myself and was curious on the ups and downs of it.


On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:32:22 -0500, Sunny
[quoted text, click to view]
Sunny
6/28/2004 9:32:22 AM
Free is always good :)

but, they have no http, no way to use them behind proxy, etc. so I do
agree with you, for now I do not see any way to not use gc.

Sunny

In article <OEqwKfkWEHA.556@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>,
rockfamily@REMOVEME.hotmail.com says...
[quoted text, click to view]
Sunny
6/28/2004 1:46:25 PM
Hi Allen,
no, I had no time. But if I do, I'll post here.

Sunny

In article <pjb0e057dor5g2nj5o09edgftdur29c3d5@4ax.com>,
allen@sparkysystems.com says...
[quoted text, click to view]
AddThis Social Bookmark Button