no, I had no time. But if I do, I'll post here.
> did you try this other channel out Sunny? I haven't had time to look
> into it myself and was curious on the ups and downs of it.
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:32:22 -0500, Sunny
> <sunnyask@icebergwireless.com> wrote:
>
> >Free is always good :)
> >
> >but, they have no http, no way to use them behind proxy, etc. so I do
> >agree with you, for now I do not see any way to not use gc.
> >
> >Sunny
> >
> >In article <OEqwKfkWEHA.556@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>,
> >rockfamily@REMOVEME.hotmail.com says...
> >>
> >> "AA" <aa@personal.net.py> wrote in message
> >> news:udWqFbiWEHA.1764@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >> >
http://www.mailframe.net/Products/PeerChannel.htm > >> >
> >> > Sound interesting no?
> >>
> >> Looks like a competitor for Genuine Channels. I think that i actually saw
> >> this one a while ago. But there are no mention of any price or terms of use.
> >> Is it free? Open source? And the page says that it requires Windows 2000/XP
> >> and .NET 1.1. Does it means that Windows 98 and .NET 1.0 are not supported?
> >> Why not? Any FAQ? Too many unanswered questions. I'll stick with good ol'
> >> genuine channel for the moment. But if it is free, it may be a very good
> >> thing for free software developpers who don't want to pay for a
> >> bidirectionnal channel.
> >>
> >>
> >>
>