Thanks - that's what I thought by the sample code went the other way. I'll
""Peter Huang" [MSFT]" wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Based on my experience, the Udpclient is just a wrap for Socket. So that we
> did not need to handle many socket related operation. But in nature, the
> UDPclient is using Socket for underlying communication.
> In my view, I think the difference is udpclient is easy use and socket
> class will have more control over the socket.
> To choose Udpclient or socket is based on your scenario, if the job can be
> done in udpclient, I think we can use the udpclient because you will find
> that it will need less code than socket class.
> TinyUDP - Simple UDP Client/Server Components for .NET
>
http://www.codeproject.com/vb/net/TinyUDP.asp >
> Best regards,
>
> Peter Huang
>
> Microsoft Online Community Support
> ==================================================
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
> ==================================================
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>