I wanted to attach SoapExtension to it and then trace SOAP messages. Maybe
in proxy. That is serializing calls. I don't want to write out XML for SOAP
Requests/Responses myself, especially not for encoded style. Invoke() method
"Dilip Krishnan" <dkrishnan@NOSPAM.geniant.com> wrote in message
news:108327632406502942845056@msnews.microsoft.com...
> Hello MarkoH,
> What would be the use of that? woudnt you still have to write the
> implementation?
>
> HTH
> Regards,
> Dilip Krishnan
> MCAD, MCSD.net
> dkrishnan at geniant dot com
>
http://www.geniant.com >
>> Okay, I have abstract class created at runtime through usage of
>> CodeDom and Microsoft.CSharp namespaces..the class is abstract and so
>> are the methods of course. How could I change this class/create new
>> class (concrete one) from this abstract class code ? Of course it
>> would be enough to just have concrete class with empty methods. Only {
>> }.
>>
>> thanks for any help,
>> M.
>> "Christoph Schittko [MVP]" <INVALIDEMAIL@austin.rr.com> wrote in
>> message news:eiXMO3e7EHA.1524@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>
>>> Oops, I just read your posting again ... you're looking to create
>>> services at runtime?
>>>
>>> You can run wsdl.exe programmatically, or you might be able to create
>>> the services by invoking a
>>> System.Web.Services.Description.ServiceDescriptionImporter with the
>>> Style property set to Server.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> Christoph Schittko
>>> MVP XML
>>>
http://weblogs.asp.net/cschittko >>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: MarkoH [mailto:marko.hrovatic@rsh.si]
>>>> Posted At: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 2:28 PM
>>>> Posted To: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.webservices
>>>> Conversation: create web service class at runtime ?
>>>> Subject: create web service class at runtime ?
>>>> Wsdl.exe /server creates abstract class derived from WebService. Is
>>>>
>>> there
>>>
>>>> a
>>>> way to create this class at runtime based on some WSDL file given at
>>>> runtime
>>>> ? What would be even better - creating concrete class but with empty
>>>> method
>>>> implementation of course since WSDL does not provide any info on
>>>> implementation.
>>>> Thanks
>>>> M.
>
>