Steven is right - you should use XML to send your data rather than directly
returning .NEt object.
encodings. SOAP encodings are standards and it has encoding for Arrays -
"Steven Cheng[MSFT]" wrote:
> Hi Elyo,
>
> Since .NET 2.0 datatable can be serialized into XML, I think you may pass
> it as a XML document/fragment to J2EE. However, it still require your J2EE
> client to be able to correctly parse the XML fragment. You may either use
> XML API or some XML-Object mapping framework to do this in J2EE.
>
> Anyway, directly return .NET object to heterogenious client is not
> recommended(no matter whether it is xml serializable or not).
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Steven Cheng
>
> Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead
>
>
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
>
> --------------------
> From: =?Utf-8?B?RWx5byBSYXZ1bmE=?= <akora@community.nospam>
> References: <9B0E1E0E-4B87-4306-84AB-881AFDC46623@microsoft.com>
> <ezP7a6TOIHA.3940@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>
> Subject: Re: WCF / J2EE interoperability - DataTable
> Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 03:56:01 -0800
>
>
> Thank you for the answer, that's exactly what I thought.
>
> I can think of many workarounds but I would be very glad to hear the
> best-practices.
>
> Elyo Ravuna
>
>
> "John Saunders [MVP]" wrote:
>
> > "Elyo Ravuna" <akora@community.nospam> wrote in message
> > news:9B0E1E0E-4B87-4306-84AB-881AFDC46623@microsoft.com...
> > > My web service is based on WCF. One of the operations needs to return a
> > > two-dimensional data structure. May I return a DataTable without losing
> > > interoperability with J2EE ?
> >
> > Of course not. Does J2EE know about .NET objects at all?
> > --
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > John Saunders | MVP - Windows Server System - Connected System Developer
> >
> >
> >
