| Groups | Blog | Home |
dotnet web services : WSHttpBinding in WCF
Hi,
If I have a WCF web service deployed that uses the WSHttpBinding, is it possible for a web service client to connect to my service if that client does not support WS-Addressing, or is WS-Addressing mandatory when the WSHttpBinding is in use? Many thanks,
Hi Dan,
As for the WCF binding's WS-Addressing feature, it does be configurable. Actually, it is controlled at the transport layer through the "MappingMode" property of the HttpTransportBindingElement and you set it to "HttpMappingMode.Soap"(By default, the HttpTransportBindingElement in WSHttpBinding set it to "HttpMappingMode.SoapWithWsAddressing" which will add WS-Addressing feature. The following article has mentioned this: http://wcf.netfx3.com/content/WindowsCommunicationFoundationWCFInteroperabil ityandMigrationwithWSE20.aspx However, currently since WSHttpBinding is a well encapsulated one, if you do need to customize this WS-Addressing feature, I suggeset you create a custom binding in which you can customize the inner bindingElements(such as adjust the properties on the HttpTransportBindingElement). Here is the MSDN document introducing this: #Creating User-Defined Bindings http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms733893.aspx In addition, here is another article mentioned customizing WCF binding which can also give you some ideas on this: http://www.pluralsight.com/blogs/aaron/archive/2006/04/18/21943.aspx Hope this helps. Sincerely, Steven Cheng Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead ================================================== Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/managednewsgroups/default.aspx#notif ications. Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/support/default.aspx. ==================================================
Hi Steven,
Thanks for the advice. I had thought that the MappingMode property you mentioned was just for WCF clients, but if it can be used on a WCF service as well thats good. Unfortunately, I cant get the MappingMode property to be accepted by the compiler. The 3rd example URI you sent shows this for a WCF client, but when I try it the compiler says its not a valid property. There is no mention of the property in the MSDN doc for the HTTPTransportBindingElement here. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.servicemodel.channels.httptransportbindingelement_properties.aspx and when I try to compile the following 2 lines of code, I get the compiler errors shown below: HttpTransportBindingElement httpElement = (HttpTransportBindingElement)be; httpElement.MappingMode = HttpMappingMode.Soap; Done building target "CoreCompile" in project "WCFServiceLibrary1.csproj" -- FAI LED. Done building project "WCFServiceLibrary1.csproj" -- FAILED. Build FAILED. App_Code\WCFService2.cs(49,33): error CS0117: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.Http TransportBindingElement' does not contain a definition for 'MappingMode' App_Code\WCFService2.cs(49,47): error CS0103: The name 'HttpMappingMode' does not exist in the current context 0 Warning(s) 2 Error(s) Is there any documentation you can point me at that shows how to do this, or have I missed something? Thanks, Dan -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [quoted text, click to view] "Steven Cheng[MSFT]" wrote:
> Hi Dan, > > As for the WCF binding's WS-Addressing feature, it does be configurable. > Actually, it is controlled at the transport layer through the "MappingMode" > property of the HttpTransportBindingElement and you set it to > "HttpMappingMode.Soap"(By default, the HttpTransportBindingElement in > WSHttpBinding set it to "HttpMappingMode.SoapWithWsAddressing" which will > add WS-Addressing feature. The following article has mentioned this: > > http://wcf.netfx3.com/content/WindowsCommunicationFoundationWCFInteroperabil > ityandMigrationwithWSE20.aspx > > However, currently since WSHttpBinding is a well encapsulated one, if you > do need to customize this WS-Addressing feature, I suggeset you create a > custom binding in which you can customize the inner bindingElements(such as > adjust the properties on the HttpTransportBindingElement). Here is the MSDN > document introducing this: > > #Creating User-Defined Bindings > http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms733893.aspx > > In addition, here is another article mentioned customizing WCF binding > which can also give you some ideas on this: > > http://www.pluralsight.com/blogs/aaron/archive/2006/04/18/21943.aspx > > Hope this helps. > > Sincerely, > > Steven Cheng > > Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead > > > > ================================================== > > Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to > http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/managednewsgroups/default.aspx#notif > ications. > > > > Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues > where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support > Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow > up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support > professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the > most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations > that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex > project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best > handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting > Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at > http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/support/default.aspx. > > ================================================== > > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > > >
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your reply and pointed out this issue. After some further checking and I found that this setting(HttpTransportBindingElement.MappingMode and HttpMappingMode) has been obsoleted in the release version. And with some further research, I've found the current corresponding setting for define the message addressing feature of the WCF binding. You can use the "TextMessageEncodingBindingElement.MessageVersion" to specify the Addressing information(it contains some predefined values such as SOAP11, SOAP11WSAddressing10 .....) #TextMessageEncodingBindingElement Members http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.servicemodel.channels.textme ssageencodingbindingelement_members.aspx Also, here are some msdn reference mentioned customize binding element(such as the TextMessageEncoding element): #How to: Configure WCF Services to Interoperate with WSE 3.0 Clients http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms730049.aspx #WCF Messaging Fundamentals http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/07/04/ServiceStation/default.aspx Hope this helps and sorry for the previous confusion. Sincerely, Steven Cheng Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead
Hi Dan,
How are you doing? Just want to check whether you've got any further progress or does the further information in my last reply helps some? If there is anything else we can help, please don't hesitate to post here. Sincerely, Steven Cheng Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead
Hi Steven,
We are trying out your suggestions this week. I will update this again to let you know whether we got it working. Thanks, Dan [quoted text, click to view] "Steven Cheng[MSFT]" wrote:
> Hi Dan, > > How are you doing? Just want to check whether you've got any further > progress or does the further information in my last reply helps some? If > there is anything else we can help, please don't hesitate to post here. > > Sincerely, > > Steven Cheng > > Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead > >
Thanks for your reply Dan,
Looking forward to your good news. Sincerely, Steven Cheng Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead
Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.
|
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
| home · blog · groups | Questions? Comments? Contact the dn |